1989
DOI: 10.5183/jjscs1988.2.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analysis in Canonical Factor Analysis

Abstract: ABSTRACTshows that a similar method can be developed also in canonical factor analysis.Two numerical examples are given for illustration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many works on the sensitivity analysis in linear regresssion analysis; $elsley, Kuh, and Welsch (1980), and Cook and Weisberg (1982), among others. In a similar context, many tools of sensitivity analysis for multivariate methods are developed recently by Tanaka and his colleagues; see , Tanaka and Odaka (1988), and Tanaka and Tarumi (1988). In this study, we extend the results obtained by Tanaka (1984) for the sensitivity analysis in Hayashi's third method of quantification.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…There are many works on the sensitivity analysis in linear regresssion analysis; $elsley, Kuh, and Welsch (1980), and Cook and Weisberg (1982), among others. In a similar context, many tools of sensitivity analysis for multivariate methods are developed recently by Tanaka and his colleagues; see , Tanaka and Odaka (1988), and Tanaka and Tarumi (1988). In this study, we extend the results obtained by Tanaka (1984) for the sensitivity analysis in Hayashi's third method of quantification.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The approximate relative changes based on linear approximation, p(') and T(1), and those based on quadratic approximation, p(i) + (e/2)P(2) and T(1) + (e/2)T(2), analysis (LSFA) and alpha factor analysis (AFA) have a common property that an eigenvalue problem of a symmetric matrix is contained as a part in their determinating equations . Based on this property Tanaka and Odaka(1989a,b,c), Tanaka and Tarumi(1989) and have derived the influence functions for the unique and common variance matrices in PFA, MLFA, LSFA, CFA, and AFA, respectively, using the perturbation expansion of T discussed in section 5.2. Let us consider the case of PFA.…”
Section: Relation With Our General Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the expansions of certain functions of eigenvalues and eigenvectors obtained by Tanaka (1988), Tanaka and Odaka (1989a,b,c) and Tanaka and Tarumi (1989) have derived the influence functions for the unique and common variance matrices in various procedures of exploratory factor analysis. The same expansions are used to evaluate the changes of the configurations of principal components or factors with RV coefficients (Benasseni, 1990;Tanaka, 1990,1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it may still be worth to study sensitivity analysis in noniterative and iterative procedures of PFA. We also consider sensitivity analysis in other factor analysis proce dures in separate papers (see Tanaka and Odaka, 1989b, c ;Tanaka and Tarumi, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%