2021
DOI: 10.1287/moor.2020.1076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analysis for the Stationary Distribution of Reflected Brownian Motion in a Convex Polyhedral Cone

Abstract: Reflected Brownian motion (RBM) in a convex polyhedral cone arises in a variety of applications ranging from the theory of stochastic networks to mathematical finance, and under general stability conditions, it has a unique stationary distribution. In such applications, to implement a stochastic optimization algorithm or quantify robustness of a model, it is useful to characterize the dependence of stationary performance measures on model parameters. In this paper, we characterize parametric sensitivities of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the revision of the paper, we learned that Lipshutz and Ramanan (2021, lemma 7.5) produce a similar result that the derivative with respect to the initial condition contracts when the RBM hits all the faces. Although the result in Lipshutz and Ramanan (2021) holds in a more general setting, that is, RBM in a convex polyhedral cone, a quantitative bound on the contraction size is not directly provided in Lipshutz and Ramanan (2021). In contrast, Lemma 5 provides an explicit expression of the contraction whenever RBM hits a face, and this is necessary for high-dimensional analysis.…”
Section: Nonstationary Error Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the revision of the paper, we learned that Lipshutz and Ramanan (2021, lemma 7.5) produce a similar result that the derivative with respect to the initial condition contracts when the RBM hits all the faces. Although the result in Lipshutz and Ramanan (2021) holds in a more general setting, that is, RBM in a convex polyhedral cone, a quantitative bound on the contraction size is not directly provided in Lipshutz and Ramanan (2021). In contrast, Lemma 5 provides an explicit expression of the contraction whenever RBM hits a face, and this is necessary for high-dimensional analysis.…”
Section: Nonstationary Error Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists κ Λ (α) < ∞ such that if (h, g) is the solution to the ESP {(d i (α), n i , c i ), i ∈ I} for f ∈ D G (R J ), and, for k = 1, 2, (φ k , η k ) is a solution to the derivative problem along h for ψ k ∈ D(R J ), then for all t < ∞, (6.7) sup We close this section with the following continuity property of the derivative map that will be instrumental in the proof of our main result. In addition to its use in this work, it is also used in [16] to show that the joint reflected diffusion and derivative process is Feller continuous. In contrast to the other results in this section, we explicitly state exactly which assumptions are required for the following theorem.…”
Section: The Skorokhod Problem and The Derivative Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing convergence of the approximation is quite subtle and relies on a continuity property of a certain map, called the derivative map. This continuity property is of independent interest; for example, it is used in [16] to prove that a reflected Brownian motion (RBM) in a convex polyhedral cone and its derivatives process are jointly Feller continuous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%