Sensitivity Analysis‐Based Automatic Parameter Calibration of the VIC Model for Streamflow Simulations Over China

Abstract

Model parameter calibration is a fundamentally important stage that must be completed before applying a model to address practical problems. In this study, we describe an automatic calibration framework that combines sensitivity analysis (SA) and an adaptive surrogate modeling-based optimization (ASMO) algorithm. We use this framework to calibrate catchment-specific sensitive parameters for streamflow simulation in the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model with a 0.25°spatial resolution over 10 major river basins of China from 1960 to 1979. We found that three parameters-the infiltration parameter (B) and two of the soil depth parameters (D 1 , D 2 )-are highly sensitive in most basins, while other parameter sensitivities are strongly related to the dynamic environment of the basin. Compared with directly calibrating the seven parameters recommended for the default calibration procedure, our framework not only reduced the computing time by two thirds through opting out of insensitive parameters (type I error) but also improved the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE) for optimized results when it identified a missing sensitive parameter (type II error) in the case study river basins. Results show that the SA-based ASMO framework is an effective and efficient model-optimization technique for matching simulated streamflow with observations across China. The NSE for monthly streamflow ranged from 0.75 to 0.97 and from 0.71 to 0.97 during the validation and calibration periods, respectively. The calibrated parameters can be applied directly in streamflow simulations across China, and the proposed calibration framework holds important implications for relevant simulation studies in other regions.

Variations in start date, end date, frequency and intensity of yearly temperature extremes across China during the period 1961–2017

“…Climate change and its impacts on water resources (Miao et al 2016, Gou et al 2020, agricultural production (Piao et al 2010), vegetation growth (Seddon et al 2016) and other areas of importance are major forces that human society will have to cope with in the 21st century (IPCC 2018). Observations show that global average surface temperature has increased about 0.85°C over the period 1880-2012 (Compo et al 2013), and the continuous emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming (IPCC 2013).…”

Sensitivity Analysis of the Rainfall–Runoff Modeling Parameters in Data-Scarce Urban Catchment

“…Hydrological models are approximations of natural systems, which create a substantial discrepancy between the results of the model and reality [15]. The results of the models need to be adjusted by means of parameter calibration, which helps to match the predictions with the corresponding observations [16][17][18]. The increase in the number of parameters that are adjusted in a model leads to a greater workload in the calibration process [19,20].…”

Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity Analysis of Water Conservation in Beijing‐Tianjin‐Hebei Urban Agglomeration Based on the Geodetector and Spatial Elastic Coefficient Trajectory Models

“…Since the second half of the 20th century, scholars have conducted a significant amount of research on the calculation of water conservation capacity and spatial mapping and have made several important achievements in theoretical exploration, index construction, and scale discussion (Duan et al, 2015;Gou et al, 2020;Gu et al, 2016;Miao et al, 2011Miao et al, , 2015Sun et al, 2019). Because runoff generation is a complex process, many hydrological models have been established and applied to address precipitation intensity, soil permeability, slope, and vegetation, including the Stanford Watershed Model (Crawford & Linsley, 1966) and the Tank Model (Barberi et al, 2019;Hashino et al, 2002).…”