2001
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2000.3265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analyses of Sensor Locations for Vibration Control and Damage Detection of Thin-Plate Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose now that sensor reading i is decoded using a linear receiver denoted by c i . 4 Writing Y = (y 1 , y 2 , . .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Suppose now that sensor reading i is decoded using a linear receiver denoted by c i . 4 Writing Y = (y 1 , y 2 , . .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, consider the same matrices when the sensor reading i is deleted from the system: 6 respectively. Based on 4 We assume that each sensor has wireless communication capabilities. 5 The difference between (7) and (2) consists not only in terms of summation.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The criterion can be the condition number of the observability matrix of the linearized tangent model of the discretized model of the process [5], the spectral condition number of the Hankel matrix [6], or the condition number of the frequency response function [7]. In this article, the condition number of the modal matrix of structure is employed to optimize sensor locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%