2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2140/aaa980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analyses of acoustic impedance inversion with full-waveform inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b At subsequent iterations, reflected energy exists in both wavefields. Cross-correlation can now update the velocity model, but the magnitude of this tomographic effect varies as R 2 , whereas updates to the reflectivity vary as R. Usually, R is much smaller than 1 (Yao and Wu 2017) the significance of FWI inverting reflection-dominated data (Wang and Rao 2009;Lazaratos et al 2011;Plessix and Li 2013;Routh et al 2016;Yao et al 2018b). The contradiction and trapping in a local minimum are the second weakness of conventional FWI for inverting reflection data.…”
Section: The Weaknesses Of Conventional Fwi For Inverting Reflection mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b At subsequent iterations, reflected energy exists in both wavefields. Cross-correlation can now update the velocity model, but the magnitude of this tomographic effect varies as R 2 , whereas updates to the reflectivity vary as R. Usually, R is much smaller than 1 (Yao and Wu 2017) the significance of FWI inverting reflection-dominated data (Wang and Rao 2009;Lazaratos et al 2011;Plessix and Li 2013;Routh et al 2016;Yao et al 2018b). The contradiction and trapping in a local minimum are the second weakness of conventional FWI for inverting reflection data.…”
Section: The Weaknesses Of Conventional Fwi For Inverting Reflection mentioning
confidence: 99%