2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9lc00975b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive tear screening of diabetic retinopathy with dual biomarkers enabled using a rapid electrokinetic patterning platform

Abstract: A screening technique with dual biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy (DR) based on optoelectrokinetics was presented. Our technique will revolutionize the diagnostic method for DR and enable an early treatment to improve patients' quality of life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For independent validation cohort, we achieved sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 83% with an AUC of 0.926 (black curve in Figure 4c‐ii), which was superior to the results reported using other molecular tools, such as GC MS (AUC = 0.739; n = 183), [ 41 ] nano‐electrospray ionization (nano‐ESI) MS (accuracy = 82.00%; n = 52), [ 42 ] and immunosensing (accuracy = 88.46%; n = 24). [ 43 ] In comparison, the diagnostic model built on the plasma MFs outperformed the traditional CM, which demonstrated an AUC of 0.718 and 0.700 in discovery and validation cohorts respectively (red curves in Figure 4c). Importantly, the performance of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) alone only afforded an AUC of 0.650 and 0.700 in validation cohort (Figure S11a,b, Supporting Information), known as the epidemiological risk factors of DR recommended by American Diabetes Association (ADA) [ 44 ] and World Health Organization (WHO).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For independent validation cohort, we achieved sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 83% with an AUC of 0.926 (black curve in Figure 4c‐ii), which was superior to the results reported using other molecular tools, such as GC MS (AUC = 0.739; n = 183), [ 41 ] nano‐electrospray ionization (nano‐ESI) MS (accuracy = 82.00%; n = 52), [ 42 ] and immunosensing (accuracy = 88.46%; n = 24). [ 43 ] In comparison, the diagnostic model built on the plasma MFs outperformed the traditional CM, which demonstrated an AUC of 0.718 and 0.700 in discovery and validation cohorts respectively (red curves in Figure 4c). Importantly, the performance of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) alone only afforded an AUC of 0.650 and 0.700 in validation cohort (Figure S11a,b, Supporting Information), known as the epidemiological risk factors of DR recommended by American Diabetes Association (ADA) [ 44 ] and World Health Organization (WHO).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrated high specificity and linear dose-dependent responses. 68 A LOD of 100 pg mL −1 was achieved with a broad range of measurement over five orders of magnitude using only 1.5 μL of tear sample. A chip sensitivity of 92.9%, specificity of 90.9%, and accuracy of 88.5% were achieved with thresholds of 250 μg mL −1 and 10 ng mL −1 for LCN1 and VEGF, respectively.…”
Section: Lab-on-a-chip Platforms For Biomarker Detection In Diabetic ...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, VEGF165 levels also significantly differ in various stages of human disease. For example, the serum of patients with diabetes, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy contains higher levels of VEGF165 compared with serum from healthy individuals ( Manaviat et al, 2011 ; Ahuja et al, 2019 ; Abu-Yaghi et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Therefore, accurate, sensitive, and rapid detection of the disease-specific biomarker VEGF165 in bodily fluids may serve as an effective tool for healthcare monitoring as well as disease diagnosis and prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%