2011
DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/26/6/064006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive SQUID magnetometry for studying nanomagnetism

Abstract: The superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer is one of the most sensitive experimental techniques to magnetically characterize samples with high sensitivity. Here we present a detailed discussion of possible artifacts and pitfalls characteristic for commercial SQUID magnetometers. This includes intrinsic artifacts which stem from the inherent design of the magnetometer as well as potential issues due to the user. We provide some guidelines how to avoid and correct these, which is of par… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
152
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, M(T ) is measured from 300 to 2 K at 10 mT (FC). The diamagnetic background of the substrate, derived from high-field M(H ) data at 300 K, has been subtracted from all magnetization data [15]. Finally, to determine the majority carrier type of the samples, the sign of the Seebeck coefficient has been determined using an ordinary hot tip (360 • C)/cold tip (RT) setup on Ohmic gold contacts in a 5 mm × 5 mm van der Pauw geometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, M(T ) is measured from 300 to 2 K at 10 mT (FC). The diamagnetic background of the substrate, derived from high-field M(H ) data at 300 K, has been subtracted from all magnetization data [15]. Finally, to determine the majority carrier type of the samples, the sign of the Seebeck coefficient has been determined using an ordinary hot tip (360 • C)/cold tip (RT) setup on Ohmic gold contacts in a 5 mm × 5 mm van der Pauw geometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very weak magnetization not only limits the practical applications, but also raises questions on the fundamentals of defect induced ferromagnetism. On the one hand, measurement artifacts in SQUID magnetometry may occur: improper mounting of samples and wrong use of sample holders can easily generate ferromagnetic like signal [32][33][34]. On the other hand, the debate over the purity of graphite and oxide substrates continues in parallel [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 Recently, we have correlated the observed ferromagnetism in ZnO with the presence of secondary Co-rich phases. 8 These conclusions about the intrinsic magnetic properties of Co:ZnO relied on avoiding measurement artefacts when performing very sensitive superconductive quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometry 9 in combination with synchrotron-based x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), x-ray linear dichroism (XLD), and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD). 5 The detection of small quantities of local structural or chemical variations using these techniques poses a significant analytical challenge and is ideally complemented by the application of advanced transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques to the same materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%