2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive electrochemical measurement of hydroxyl radical generation induced by the xanthine–xanthine oxidase system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These LOD values are comparable to the results of our previous reports for Cat (8 nM) 14 and 2,6-dimethylhydroquinone (1 nM). 15 The present biosensor was stable at between pH 6 and 8. Within this pH range, the sensitivity increased as the test solution became more alkaline, according to the pH dependence of the activity of PQQ-GDH.…”
Section: Calibration Curvesmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These LOD values are comparable to the results of our previous reports for Cat (8 nM) 14 and 2,6-dimethylhydroquinone (1 nM). 15 The present biosensor was stable at between pH 6 and 8. Within this pH range, the sensitivity increased as the test solution became more alkaline, according to the pH dependence of the activity of PQQ-GDH.…”
Section: Calibration Curvesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In our recent study, enzyme-catalyzed signal amplification was introduced to the amperometric detection of the hydroxyl radical. 14,15 In the presence of an aromatic trapping agent, pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (PQQ-GDH, E.C. 1.1.5.2) as a catalyst, and its substrate D-glucose, the current signal for the trapping adducts from hydroxyl radical was amplified and detected sensitively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%