2014
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2013.1036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensing nodes selection and data fusion in cooperative spectrum sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (13) and (14) in Lemma 1, it can be seen that P (F C) f and P (F C) m monotonically increase and decrease, respectively, over N . Thus, from (19), (20), (21) and (22), the increased number of SUs helps both CSS schemes improve the MDP, however, causing a higher FAP.…”
Section: B Cooperative Spectrum Sensing (Css)mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From (13) and (14) in Lemma 1, it can be seen that P (F C) f and P (F C) m monotonically increase and decrease, respectively, over N . Thus, from (19), (20), (21) and (22), the increased number of SUs helps both CSS schemes improve the MDP, however, causing a higher FAP.…”
Section: B Cooperative Spectrum Sensing (Css)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The overhead energy caused by the CSS was also dealt with in [12] where an energy-efficient node selection was proposed to select the best node based on the binary knapsack problem. In [13], the selection of sensing nodes can also be realised by linearly weighting the sensing data at all sensing nodes. Considering the scenario when only partial information of SUs and PUs is available in the wireless sensor networks, an energy-efficient sensor selection algorithm has been proposed in [14] to minimise the energy consumption while still satisfying the average detection probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As defined in (13) and (14), the attenuation coefficient is proportional to b i,j , and the distance is inversely proportional to b i,j . When (11) and (12) are determined, the auto-logistic model of the Markov random field is degraded into the Ising model owing to the first-order neighborhood system, which is similar to the image segmentation. Thus, the conditional probability can be expressed as…”
Section: Modeling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case, whereby a single SU sensing is shadowed, in severe multipath fading and shadowing effects, the SU may not reliably detect the primary user (PU) signal and access the channel when there is a primary signal present causing interference to the licensed PU . To overcome the hidden terminal problem and increase the spectrum sensing reliability, cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS) has been studied in References . In general, CSS can be classified as either being centralized or distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centralized CSS operates in two categories as follows: (i) the observations are preprocessed by the SUs to produce their measurement or test statistics. From the reported measurement, the fusion center FC makes the final judgment; (ii) the FC processes the total received samples forwarded from each SU to make the final decision . Category (ii) requires a large portion of overhead as SUs report their collected samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%