2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2000.tb00730.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensing Lead Failure in Implantable Defibrillators:

Abstract: Late lead failure due to insulation defects in BT-10 sensing leads (causing inappropriate ICD activation) is a relatively common and progressive phenomenon, with difficulties becoming apparent as long as 4 years after implant. This problem is a likely cause of inappropriate shocks in patients with BT-10 leads. Implantation of a new sensing lead should be considered at the time of elective pulse generator replacement, even in the absence of demonstrable oversensing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) has become standard therapy for patients with life‐threatening or potentially life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias 1,2 . However, despite increasing numbers of implants, ICD lead reliability continues to be an important clinical problem 3–7 . Lead failure can have a variety of clinical consequences, the most common being delivery of inappropriate shocks (IS) during sinus rhythm due to oversensing of make‐brake potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) has become standard therapy for patients with life‐threatening or potentially life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias 1,2 . However, despite increasing numbers of implants, ICD lead reliability continues to be an important clinical problem 3–7 . Lead failure can have a variety of clinical consequences, the most common being delivery of inappropriate shocks (IS) during sinus rhythm due to oversensing of make‐brake potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dedicated bipolar ventricular leads (tip‐ring sensing) were thought less prone to ventricular oversensing than integrated bipolar leads (tip‐distal coil sensing). In a direct comparison of the two leads, there was more inappropriate arrhythmia detection (due to lead failure) with dedicated bipolar leads, than with integrated bipolar leads (17.8% vs. 4.3%) 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a direct comparison of the 2 leads, Degeratu et al reported that there were more inappropriate arrhythmia detection (because of lead failure) with dedicated bipolar leads than with integrated bipolar leads (17.8% versus 4.3%). 16 Nevertheless, Freedman et al 17 in a study with 292 patients who were randomly assigned to receive dedicated or integrated bipolar RV leads at the time of cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantation reported that integrated bipolar RV defibrillator leads had a significantly lower incidence of RV anodal stimulation when compared with dedicated bipolar RV defibrillation leads, but with no clinically detectable oversensing or undersensing, and with no inappropriate ventricular tachyarrhythmia detections for either lead type. Whether sensing configuration has any relevance in patients with BrS has not been specifically evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%