2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2010.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensing device for measuring infants’ grasping actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the infants exhibited mostly bimanual reaching and grasping behavior, typical for infants of those ages [7]. One study determined that two-year old toddlers were able to grasp within a range of 0-20.68 kPa [15]. For haptic measurements, both infant 2 and 3 grasped the toy within this range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of the infants exhibited mostly bimanual reaching and grasping behavior, typical for infants of those ages [7]. One study determined that two-year old toddlers were able to grasp within a range of 0-20.68 kPa [15]. For haptic measurements, both infant 2 and 3 grasped the toy within this range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maestro et al outlined the development of a toy that used a pressure sensor to quantify infant grasping forces [7], [15]. First, the law of affordance was taken into account.…”
Section: Design Of Smartoysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these studies have utilized technologies to assess grasping behavior in terms of strength and holding time, as well as to investigate the relationship between grasping pattern and intrinsic (e.g., infant gender, weight, premature births) and extrinsic factors (e.g., object shape and texture) [ 14 , 15 ]. The aforementioned measuring systems have used pressure transducers based on electrical components which are unusable inside the MRI scanner [ 6 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. MR-compatible technology requires unconventional solutions to ensure safety due to the strong static magnetic field and avoid electromagnetic interference (EMI), with further attention required for successfully imaging infant subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as infants are non-collaborative subjects, the assessment should be focused on measuring their natural movements, performed in an ecological setting with realistic tasks, such as toy play. 14,42 Kinematic description of upper limb infant motility in natural environment and during play was however despite large importance scarcely studied. 22 A natural setting in combination with adequate sensor systems could be suitable for studying infants' interaction with objects, which could lead to establishment of standard approach development characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%