2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.12.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensing behaviors of polypyrrole sensor under humidity condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that water vapor is adsorbed on the surface of GO, which increases its conductivity drastically due to proton exchange. According to the literature, the response time is defined as the amount of time required for the impedance to change by 90% of the total impedance [29]. For the sensor exposed to 60% RH, the response time was about 100 s. This compares well with the response times for other humidity sensors reported in the literature [30]- [32].…”
Section: Humidity Sensing Experimentssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This shows that water vapor is adsorbed on the surface of GO, which increases its conductivity drastically due to proton exchange. According to the literature, the response time is defined as the amount of time required for the impedance to change by 90% of the total impedance [29]. For the sensor exposed to 60% RH, the response time was about 100 s. This compares well with the response times for other humidity sensors reported in the literature [30]- [32].…”
Section: Humidity Sensing Experimentssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The absence of response to NO 2 is attributed to the highly doped state of the polypyrrole and therefore the inability for an electron acceptor like NO 2 to extract further electrons from the backbone. Polypyrrole-based gas sensors are reported to be sensitive to humidity with as much as 75% decrease in response resulting from a 5% increase in relative humidity [31]. The problem of humidity can be resolved by passing the sample through a desiccant before analyzing or replacing the chloride with a more hydrophobic dopant such as ptoluene sulfonate.…”
Section: Gas Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5(a) to estimate the humidity sensing properties. Generally, the time taken by a sensor to reach 90% of the total impedance change is defined as the response time or recovery time [40]. The response time (as the humidity changes from 11% to 95% RH) is about 2 s and the recovery time (as the humidity changes from 95% to 11% RH) is about 50 s. The adsorption and desorption processes of water vapor are corresponding to the exothermic and endothermic processes, and the endothermic speed is slower than exothermic speed [39].…”
Section: Humidity Sensing Properties Of Nbt-bt6 Nanofibersmentioning
confidence: 99%