2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07855-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensibility, specificity, and accuracy of the Sinonasal Outcome Test 8 (SNOT-8) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS): a cross-sectional cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, more feasible and easy questionnaire that associated with symptoms may be used to reduce time consuming in the future. 41 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, more feasible and easy questionnaire that associated with symptoms may be used to reduce time consuming in the future. 41 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the six-month FU, the pooled result of two studies ( n = 147) showed a significantly greater improvement in total SNOT-20 scores in the groups that received CHMs, with no heterogeneity. Future studies could consider using SNOT-8 as a more feasible and accessible subjective score for symptoms assessment [ 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Were Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT), including SNOT20 [ 57 ], SNOT22 [ 58 ] and SNOT8 [ 59 ], visual analogue scale for total nasal symptoms (VAS-TNS) and/or VAS for individual symptoms (VAS-IS), Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (LM) [ 60 ], Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (LK) [ 61 , 62 ], Mucociliary transport time (MTT) [ 63 ], Mucociliary transport rate (MTR), Mucociliary clearance as percentage (MC), and adverse events (AEs) [ 64 ]. Effective rate scales not used internationally, and measures developed by the authors were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Langdon et al ( 48 ) administered the SNOT-22 as an additional/complementary outcome measure to investigate QoL in PTOD patients. In fact, the tool seems particularly useful in detecting changes in QoL according to smell symptoms ( 53 , 54 ). In this vein, Neumann et al ( 19 ) investigated the PTOD in moderate and severe TBI by assessing also emotional sequelae, through the administration of a complete battery, which included: (i) Olfaction (Brief Smell Identification Test-BSIT) ( 41 ); (ii) facial affect recognition [Diagnostic Assessment of Nonverbal Affect 2-Adult Faces (DANVA2-AF)] ( 55 ); (iii) vocal affect recognition [Diagnostic Assessment of Nonverbal Affect 2-Adult Paralanguage (DANVA2-AP)] ( 56 ); (iv) emotional inference [Emotional Inference from Stories Test (EIST)] ( 57 ) and (v) empathy [Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)] ( 58 ).…”
Section: Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods In Olfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%