Strategy as Practice 2007
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511618925.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
1,235
2
50

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 725 publications
(1,305 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
1,235
2
50
Order By: Relevance
“…An example can be found in the notion of sensemaking, which refers to the idea that individuals are continuously bombarded by ambiguous environmental and organizational information that must be somehow noticed, interpreted, and acted upon (e.g., Milliken, 1990;Weick, 1979). As such, sensemaking involves the reciprocal interaction of scanning (i.e., information seeking), interpretation, and action (Gioia and Chittipeddi, 1991). Although interpretation, which refers to the process by which the ambiguous information is structured so that it may provide meaning, significance, and a basis for action (Milliken, 1990), and action are explicitly included in Rest's framework, the notion of scanning is not explicitly included.…”
Section: Theoretical and Conceptual Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example can be found in the notion of sensemaking, which refers to the idea that individuals are continuously bombarded by ambiguous environmental and organizational information that must be somehow noticed, interpreted, and acted upon (e.g., Milliken, 1990;Weick, 1979). As such, sensemaking involves the reciprocal interaction of scanning (i.e., information seeking), interpretation, and action (Gioia and Chittipeddi, 1991). Although interpretation, which refers to the process by which the ambiguous information is structured so that it may provide meaning, significance, and a basis for action (Milliken, 1990), and action are explicitly included in Rest's framework, the notion of scanning is not explicitly included.…”
Section: Theoretical and Conceptual Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are clever techniques often used by organisational development specialists or professionals to create change, and here they are clearly being used alongside explicit CSR. Some researchers call the use of techniques to influence sensemaking, 'sensegiving' (Gioia and Chittipeddi, 1991) and claim sensegiving is a 'fundamental leadership activity within organisational sensemaking' (Maitlis, 2005, p. 22). However, the perception that one is 'sensegiving' is arguably also learned through a sensemaking process: the CSR Team Manager also described how she and the CSR team developed this influence strategy through a process of trial and error, retrospectively interpreting that their influence techniques had achieved the desired outcomes.…”
Section: Explicit Csr Is Dominantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensemaking is a core element because it is the primary site where meanings materialize that inform and constrain identity and action (Mills, 2003, p. 35). Sensemaking is also about organizing through communication: Gioia and Chittipeddi (1991) present a variant of sensegiving, undertaken to create meanings for a target audience (e.g., insider versus outsider). Moreover, Wright's (2004) conception of enhancing inductive strategizing through sensemaking and scenario thinking provides a theoretical examination of their roles in enhancing inductive strategizing.…”
Section: Analytical Distinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%