2007
DOI: 10.3200/jexe.75.3.203-220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sense of Belonging in College Freshmen at the Classroom and Campus Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
501
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 693 publications
(602 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
23
501
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this relationship was not seen for men given that a negative view of climate did not result in significantly greater stress or negative views of campus climate. Freeman, Anderman, and Jensen (2007) conducted a study to examine the association between the sense of belonging in a single class and belonging at the university level using two variables, faculty-student interaction and sense of social acceptance, that together are designed to cultivate a sense of belonging. The results suggest that there is no relationship between the sense of belonging that a student has for a single class and the sense of belonging that the student has with the university as a whole.…”
Section: Connectednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this relationship was not seen for men given that a negative view of climate did not result in significantly greater stress or negative views of campus climate. Freeman, Anderman, and Jensen (2007) conducted a study to examine the association between the sense of belonging in a single class and belonging at the university level using two variables, faculty-student interaction and sense of social acceptance, that together are designed to cultivate a sense of belonging. The results suggest that there is no relationship between the sense of belonging that a student has for a single class and the sense of belonging that the student has with the university as a whole.…”
Section: Connectednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 For example, positive interactions in group discussions could trigger feelings of relatedness to other students and the instructor; open expression of ideas could contribute to students' sense of control and autonomy; and the use of higher-level cognitive strategies in situated social interactions could bolster a sense of competence. [30][31][32][33][34] Ultimately, the trends observed across our dataset are likely the result of some combination of both of these factors, as well as other personal and socialcontextual influences not yet identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following from related social-psychological traditions concerning need for affiliation (Murray, 1938), social support (Cohen & McKay, 1984), Self-Determination Theory (relatedness; Ryan & Deci, 2000), and Attachment Theory (Bowlby, 1951(Bowlby, , 2008, findings consistently demonstrate the importance of perceived belongingness and closeness with similar others (for reviews, see Bergin & Bergin, 2009;Niemiec & Ryan, 2009). In educational settings, findings further show students who perceive closeness, relatedness, and support from peers to demonstrate better psychological, behavioral, and academic outcomes (e.g., Freeman, Anderman, & Jensen, 2007;Furrer & Skinner, 2003;Goodenow, 1993;Locke, 2003;Van Ryzin, Gravely, & Roseth, 2009). However, although related constructs such as collective self-esteem have also been found to predict better psychological adjustment in adult populations (e.g., Bailis, Chipperfield, & Helgason, 2008;Crocker, Luhtanen, Blaine, & Broadmax, 1994), the extent to which teachers strategically compare themselves with similar others in response to teachingrelated challenges has yet to be examined.…”
Section: Horizontal Social Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%