2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensations of skin infestation linked to abnormal frontolimbic brain reactivity and differences in self-representation

Abstract: (2015) Sensations of skin infestation linked to abnormal frontolimbic brain reactivity and differences in self-representation. Neuropsychologia,[77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96] This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/56107/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found evidence for structural brain changes in insular cortex, a brain region known to mediate feelings of disgust and as a potential source of interoceptive predictions (Wicker et al, 2003;Craig, 2003;Paulus and Stein, 2009). Similarly, a recent functional MRI study in DI patients found changes in neural activity not only in frontal but also insular and temporal cortices next to limbic structures, such as the amygdala (Eccles et al,. 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We also found evidence for structural brain changes in insular cortex, a brain region known to mediate feelings of disgust and as a potential source of interoceptive predictions (Wicker et al, 2003;Craig, 2003;Paulus and Stein, 2009). Similarly, a recent functional MRI study in DI patients found changes in neural activity not only in frontal but also insular and temporal cortices next to limbic structures, such as the amygdala (Eccles et al,. 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[104][105][106] Despite lacking clear evidence, [107] , it is speculated that in patients with delusional infestation, overactive contagious itch centres or an overactivity of the mirror neuron system may play a role. [98,108] Contagious itch points to the suggestibility of itch and potentially substantial placebo effects. [95] It has even been speculated that if there is a central source able to produce itch, there must also be a way to reverse the mechanism and produce cure.…”
Section: Contagious Itch Placebo Effects and Nocebo Effects On Itchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[138] Although classified separately in the DSM-V, [139] there is often a clinical overlap between SPD and OPD (maybe because of this shared fMRI finding), which might also explain the profound treatment resistance often observed in SPD. [140,141] Eccles et al [108] examined the neural basis of delusional infestation (DI). These patients had a poorer sensitivity to interoceptive signals and greater susceptibility to take on an illusion of body ownership.…”
Section: Non-itch Fmri Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some clinical populations, e.g. people with schizophrenia (Thakkar, Nichols, McIntosh, & Park, 2011), or delusional skin infestation (Eccles et al, 2015), there is an enhanced plasticity of body ownership, with greater proprioceptive drift towards the rubber hand than controls. In contrast, people with autistic spectrum conditions have a reduced susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion (Cascio, Foss-Feig, Burnette, Heacock, & Cosby, 2012;Paton, Hohwy, & Enticott, 2012), suggesting that clinical syndromes are distributed along a spectrum of body ownership plasticity, arguably a proxy for the strength of self-representation (such as self/other distinction).…”
Section: Plasticity Of Bodily Perception In Tsmentioning
confidence: 99%