“…In addition, our study used these methods while sampling four different cultural groups and systematically comparing the assortative coefficients across them (see Egan et al, 2005). These different coefficients were used to assess different kinds of relation: (1) the Within-Person Correlation Coefficients among self-ratings (operationalized as the correlation between the Respondent Rating Self scores) were used to assess how highly these four traits were naturally associated with each other, as a baseline for comparison with how high any cross-trait associations might be across relationship partners; (2) the Inter-Rater Reliabilities (operationalized as the correlation between the Partner Rating Respondent scores with the Respondent Rating Self scores), were use to assess the Target Accuracy (Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006) of each partner rating the other on these four traits, to determine whether sufficient mutual familiarity on these traits existed among partners for the partner ratings to be meaningful; (3) the Perceived Assortative Pairing Coefficients (operationalized as the correlation between Respondent Rating Self scores with the Respondent Rating Partner scores), to determine the Perceived Similarity (Acitelli, Douban, & Veroff, 1993) among partners, which may sometimes be a stronger predictor of relationship outcomes than actual similarity; and (4) the Actual Assortative Pairing Coefficients (operationalized as the correlation between Respondent Rating Self scores with the Partner Rating Self scores), to assess the Actual Similarity (Acitelli, Douban, & Veroff, 1993) among partners, with respect to how each of them represent themselves by self-report.…”