Senior Friendly Communities: Designing an approach for cross-border exchange of public health policy

Abstract

People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

Implementations of Evidence-Based eHealth Interventions for Caregivers of People With Dementia in Municipality Contexts (Myinlife and Partner in Balance): Evaluation Study

“… a Population statistics sourced from the euPrevent Senior Friendly Communities project [ 25 , 26 , 28 ]. …”

Towards age‐friendly municipalities: What are municipalities doing to support their ageing population with mental health problems?

“…Because of cofunding from the Dutch Province of Limburg, the inclusion area of SFC was extended to cover the EMR plus the northern part of Dutch Limburg, and not only the southern part. There were several different steps in this project, such as a preassessment of the situation in the participating municipalities at the start of the project, implementing interventions, and postassessments (Schichel et al, 2020). The current paper results from the pre‐assessments.…”

Age-friendly municipalities in a cross-border context

“…Although the primary aim of the interviews was to investigate the awareness, attitudes, capacity, mandate and policies of municipalities, the assessments resulted in an action by the municipalities to start a dialogue with relevant stakeholders and already created some awareness. In the set-up of the project this was not foreseen, as only the steps after the assessment were meant to encourage action (for an overview of the SFC project see (Schichel et al, 2020)). This is in contrast to participatory action research which aims not only to produce knowledge but also action directly useful to a group of people (Walter, 2009), and the SFC project was not originally set up as such.…”

“…All municipalities in the abovementioned SFC area (EMR plus the northern part of the Dutch Province of Limburg) received an invitation to take part in the SFC project. They were included on a first-come-first-served basis, as has been described in an earlier paper (Schichel et al, 2020). The municipalities varied in population size from approximately 4,000 to approximately 200,000 inhabitants.…”

“…Because of co-funding from the Dutch Province of Limburg, the inclusion area of SFC was extended to cover the EMR plus the northern part of Dutch Limburg, and not only the southern part. There were several different steps in this project, such as a pre-assessment of the situation in the participating municipalities at the start of the project, implementing interventions, and post-assessments (Schichel et al, 2020). The current paper results from the pre-assessments.…”