Senior entrepreneurship and qualified senior unemployment

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to characterize the senior entrepreneurship context, as a solution for an unemployed qualified segment between 45 and 60 years of age, in the Northern region of Portugal, from a national and European perspective, associated to the growth trend of qualified senior unemployment in the region, based on a statistical angle and from the point of view of the motivations to become self-employed with a business creation project. Design/methodology/approach This empirical study is a cross-sectional study of mixed nature, that reconciles qualitative and quantitative analysis. A questionnaire was made and applied to a sample of 1,000 individuals and seven semi-structured interviews which four focus groups were carried out. Findings Findings allow us to conclude that the studied segment, skilled unemployed individuals between the ages of 45 and 60, is a growing segment that tends to evolve into long-term unemployment and underlines a potential reluctant entrepreneurship by necessity, i.e. a reduced motivational content of these unemployed people for the creation of their own job. The authors can conclude, in the Portuguese case, that government policies relating to taxes and bureaucracy are considered as unfavorable conditions or potentially inhibitors of senior entrepreneurship. Lastly, the authors underline the clear absence of specific support programs and measures for the promotion of entrepreneurship among the qualified senior unemployed and the authors propose an ecosystem creation regarding the specifics of the target group of the study. Practical implications The study identifies a set of actions and/or orientations that could be relevant and taken into account by the decision makers. Originality/value The main contribution of this paper is the better knowledge of the context and motivations for qualified senior entrepreneurship, as well as the associated personal, economic and social barriers; and the specific suggestions provided to policy makers in order to improve the context of the senior entrepreneurship.

Are There Differences and Complementarities between Senior and Young Entrepreneurs? An Intergenerational Perspective

“…There are numerous studies in the literature on senior entrepreneurship [60] as a means to solve the social and economic problems of an aging population, because those people would stay in the labor force and might even generate economic growth [61,62]. There are authors who address differing aspects of this phenomenon related to seniors' profiles and driving motivations [63,64], while the European Union has prepared the report document Senior Entrepreneurship Good Practices Manual [65], in which, although only senior entrepreneurship is addressed, it has an implicit intergenerational perspective because it identifies the various roles of seniors in the entrepreneurial process (entrepreneur, supporting businesses, or mentoring) in a series of cases analyzed. This study has been complemented by other projects in this area, such as the Senior Entrepreneurs: Best Practices Exchange [66] and the 50+ Entrepreneurship Platform [67].…”

Factors influencing senior entrepreneurship in Chile. A GEM perspective

“…Finally, the promotion of the entrepreneurial spirit through education, from the beginning, without ignoring the elderly (Fernández & Rey, 2010), is another fundamental motivating factor for senior entrepreneurship.…”

Senior and technology entrepreneurship: An analysis for OECD countries

“…Both effects reduce the actual tension in social security systems, thereby facilitating governments to better address population aging. These benefits can be increased if governments implement policies to promote and improve senior entrepreneurship just as they do with young people (Figueiredo & Paiva, 2018). Entrepreneurship in older adults has recently become a social and public policy aimed at fostering the development of new economic income when pensions are limited and there are few opportunities to participate in the labour market (Kautonen, 2012).…”