1987
DOI: 10.1287/moor.12.4.634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Send-and-Split Method for Minimum-Concave-Cost Network Flows

Abstract: Many problems from inventory, production and capacity planning, and from network design, exhibit scale economies and can be formulated in terms of finding minimum-additive-concave-cost nonnegative network flows. We reduce the problem to an equivalent one in which the arc flow costs are nonnegative and give a dynamic-programming method, called the send-and-split method, to solve it. The main work of the method entails repeatedly solving set-splitting and minimum-cost-chain problems. In uncapacitated networks wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models that we consider in this paper can also be formulated as special instances of the minimum concave-cost network flow problem (Erickson et al 1987, Guisewite and Pardalos 1993, Lamar 1993, Veinott 1969, and Zangwill 1968. Efficient algorithms have been developed to solve this network flow problem on some special networks, for example, strong-series-parallel networks (Ward 1999) and networks with a fixed number of sources and nonlinear arc costs (Tuy et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models that we consider in this paper can also be formulated as special instances of the minimum concave-cost network flow problem (Erickson et al 1987, Guisewite and Pardalos 1993, Lamar 1993, Veinott 1969, and Zangwill 1968. Efficient algorithms have been developed to solve this network flow problem on some special networks, for example, strong-series-parallel networks (Ward 1999) and networks with a fixed number of sources and nonlinear arc costs (Tuy et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the leaves of the tree decomposition that are added in step (6.2) of the Thinning procedure, the cost of a subset of portal edges is calculated as, e.g., the cost of the minimum Steiner tree interconnecting these portals in the corresponding brick. Because the bricks are planar, this cost can be calculated by the algorithm of [12] for Steiner tree or [4] for 2-edge connectivity. Because all the portal edges of this brick are present in this bag (recall that we do not delete parallel portal edges after contractions), all possible solutions restricted to the corresponding brick will be considered.…”
Section: Ptas Via Dynamic Programming Over the Bricksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done via a dynamic programming inside the brick. The details are omitted here since a similar DP has been described in [8,17].…”
Section: A2 Configurations For the Dynamic Programmentioning
confidence: 99%