1988
DOI: 10.1049/ip-j.1988.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semivectorial polarised finite difference method for optical waveguides with arbitrary index profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is observed that QSCM and FDM mode solver have the same convergence rate. However, with the same grid size, namely the same amount of computation effort, QSCM mode solver is more accurate than conventional FDM mode solver [4,5], however, it should be addressed that the current QSCM loses the advantage comparing to the improved finite difference method [7,10,11] where higher order boundary conditions are applied. The improved QSCM with higher order boundary conditions will be our future work.…”
Section: Verification Of Qsc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it is observed that QSCM and FDM mode solver have the same convergence rate. However, with the same grid size, namely the same amount of computation effort, QSCM mode solver is more accurate than conventional FDM mode solver [4,5], however, it should be addressed that the current QSCM loses the advantage comparing to the improved finite difference method [7,10,11] where higher order boundary conditions are applied. The improved QSCM with higher order boundary conditions will be our future work.…”
Section: Verification Of Qsc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, researchers have proposed and developed various numerical methods; among which the finite-difference method (FDM) and the finite element method (FEM) are two of the most popular approaches [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The finite difference method (FDM) gains its popularity owing to its simplicity and effectiveness [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. On the other hand, the finite element method (FEM) is more adaptive for complex waveguide structures with irregular interfaces [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first such approximate FD stencil was developed by Stern [1]. The 3−point FD approxi− mation proposed by Stern allowed for obtaining a good approximation for the field distributions and propagation constants if the discontinuities were placed half way be− tween the nodal points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C ONSIDERABLE effort has been made to improve a finite-difference (FD) formula for the analysis of a step-index optical waveguide [1]- [4]. Pioneering work on a modified FD formula was carried out by Stern [1], who introduced the concept of a semivectorial mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pioneering work on a modified FD formula was carried out by Stern [1], who introduced the concept of a semivectorial mode. This approach assumes that all the discontinuities of dielectric materials are either parallel or orthogonal to -and -axes, and that the fields are either -or -polarized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%