Abstract:Abstract-The detection of mine-like objects (MLOs) in sidescan sonar (SSS) imagery continues to be a challenging task. In practice, subject matter experts tediously analyze images searching for MLOs. In the literature, there are many attempts at automated target recognition (ATR) to detect the MLOs. This paper focuses on the classifiers that use computer vision and machine learning approaches. These techniques require large amounts of data, which is often prohibitive. For this reason, the use of synthetic and … Show more
“…The data provide information on natural clutter contacts, whereas UXO contacts are then imported through simulations [5] [20]. The benefit of such an approach has been demonstrated on high-frequency side-scan sonar for the classification of minelike objects [19]. Furthermore, such an approach could also aid to resolve the problem of imbalanced data, i.e.…”
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
“…The data provide information on natural clutter contacts, whereas UXO contacts are then imported through simulations [5] [20]. The benefit of such an approach has been demonstrated on high-frequency side-scan sonar for the classification of minelike objects [19]. Furthermore, such an approach could also aid to resolve the problem of imbalanced data, i.e.…”
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
“…In another work [46], comparing the classifiers that use machine-learning approach and computer vision. The work corresponds to taking the aid of semisynthetic data for preprocessing of data before it is given as an input to machine-learning and computer vision approaches.…”
Section: Minesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has a huge set of applications offered for nearshore surveillance such as detection of battle ships and arrival of logistics. [45] 1D Bay n/a n/a Few Acoustic Simulation [46] n/a Seabed n/a n/a n/a n/a Software Submarines [47] 2D Sea 110 m n/a n/a Acoustic Real-time [48] 4D Sea n/a Localization n/a n/a Real-time [ The GLINT10 [50] field test trials were performed in order to test the warfare surveillance. The work focuses on signal processing capabilities of the said project.…”
There is no escaping fact that a huge amount of unexploited resources lies underwater which covers almost 70% of the Earth. Yet, the aquatic world has mainly been unaffected by the recent advances in the area of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and their pervasive penetration in modern day research and industrial development. The current pace of research in the area of underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) is slow due to the difficulties arising in transferring the state-of-the-art WSNs to their underwater equivalent. Maximum underwater deployments rely on acoustics for enabling communication combined with special sensors having the capacity to take on harsh environment of the oceans. However, sensing and subsequent transmission tend to vary as per different subsea environments; for example, deep sea exploration requires altogether a different approach for communication as compared to shallow water communication. This paper particularly focuses on comprehensively gathering most recent developments in UWSN applications and their deployments. We have classified the underwater applications into five main classes, namely, monitoring, disaster, military, navigation, and sports, to cover the large spectrum of UWSN. The applications are further divided into relevant subclasses. We have also shown the challenges and opportunities faced by recent deployments of UWSN.
“…Additionally, the Haar-like feature classifier in the next section was previously trained on a separate data set of 975 images each containing an MLO, with 426 truncated cones and 549 stealth wedges. This training data set was collected in the same manner and in the same fields of San Diego Bay [13].…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research paper by Viola and Jones was proposed as a face detector, but it has been applied to many other targets [9]- [11]. This concept has also been applied to MLO detection in sonar, but using a variation of boosting called GentleBoost [12], [13].…”
Abstract-Detection of mine-like objects (MLOs) in sidescan sonar imagery is a problem that affects our military in terms of safety and cost. The current process involves large amounts of time for subject matter experts to analyze sonar images searching for MLOs. The automation of the detection process has been heavily researched over the years and some of these computer vision approaches have improved dramatically, providing substantial processing speed benefits. However, the human visual system has an unmatched ability to recognize objects of interest. This paper posits a brain-computer interface (BCI) approach, that combines the complementary benefits of computer vision and human vision. The first stage of the BCI, a Haar-like feature classifier, is cascaded in to the second stage, rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) of images chips. The RSVP paradigm maximizes throughput while allowing an electroencephalography (EEG) interest classifier to determine the human subjects' recognition of objects. In an additional proposed BCI system we add a third stage that uses a trained support vector machine (SVM) based on the Haar-like features of stage one and the EEG interest scores of stage two. We characterize and show performance improvements for subsets of these BCI systems over the computer vision and human vision capabilities alone.Index Terms-Boosting, brain-computer interface (BCI), minelike object (MLO), object detection, rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), sidescan sonar.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.