2011
DOI: 10.1021/ja206915m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semisynthesis of Fluorescent Metabolite Sensors on Cell Surfaces

Abstract: Progress in understanding signal transduction and metabolic pathways is hampered by a shortage of suitable sensors for tracking metabolites, second messengers, and neurotransmitters in living cells. Here we introduce a class of rationally designed semisynthetic fluorescent sensor proteins, called Snifits, for measuring metabolite concentrations on the cell surface of mammalian cells. Functional Snifits are assembled on living cells through two selective chemical labeling reactions of a genetically encoded prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior of Snifit-iGluR5 confirms the general validity of our sensor concept. 7 The maximum ratio change ΔR max of Snifit-iGluR5 amounts to 1.93 ± 0.11. By fitting the glutamate titration data to a single binding isotherm, we obtained a K d comp,glutamate = 12 ± 6 μM ( Figure 2B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This behavior of Snifit-iGluR5 confirms the general validity of our sensor concept. 7 The maximum ratio change ΔR max of Snifit-iGluR5 amounts to 1.93 ± 0.11. By fitting the glutamate titration data to a single binding isotherm, we obtained a K d comp,glutamate = 12 ± 6 μM ( Figure 2B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We have shown in our previous work that the inclusion of a rigid polyproline linker between SNAP-and CLIP-tag leads to greatly improved sensor proteins in terms of their maximum ratio changes. 7 The polyproline linker increases the distance between the two fluorophores in the open state but not in the closed state of the sensor protein, which leads to a net increase of the sensor's dynamic range. 7 The fusion protein was successfully expressed and purified from Escherichia coli Rosetta gami and labeled with the molecules BG-PEG 11 -Cy5-glutamate 1 and CLIP-Surface 547 ( Figure S1B), which is a substrate for labeling CLIP-tag with the fluorescent dye DY-547 ( Figure S3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small synthetic dyes generally give larger signal changes and may be more suitable for applications in vitro, whereas genetically encoded biosensors are the method of choice for measurements in cells or in vivo [9,10]. There are also approaches combining the two strategies by genetic fusion with protein tags, such as SNAP-tag or CLIP-tag [11,12], which can then be chemically modified with fluorescent dyes [13,14], as outlined in Sect. 2.3.…”
Section: Protein-based Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some breakthroughs occurred in the covalent bio-conjugate field, where the same target ligand for capture may be chemically coupled with unique color fluorophores, a very similar approach to using commercially labeled antibodies for labeling cells (Chen et al, 2007;Kosaka et al, 2009;Vivero-Pol et al, 2005;Lee et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2014;Uttamapinant et al, 2010;Wombacher et al, 2010;Yao et al, 2012). Likewise, other groups have utilized bio-conjugate platforms based on tandem dye interactions that have resulted in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), a donor-acceptor approach that amplifies the Stokes shift of a molecule resulting in fluorescence emissions at longer wavelengths (Brun et al, 2009(Brun et al, , 2011Gallo et al, 2015;Pham et al, 2015;Rajapakse et al, 2010;Robers et al, 2009;Saunders et al, 2014;Yushchenko et al, 2012;Zürn et al, 2010). As a result, we find that current methods prove lacking in multi-color detection and real-time signal modulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%