2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2017.2728067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semisupervised PolSAR Image Classification Based on Improved Cotraining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the semi-supervised methods can not only use the information of labeled samples, but also utilize the information of the unlabeled ones to improve the classification performance [ 20 ]. Moreover, in practice, it is feasible to obtain a larger number of unlabeled PolSAR images, which makes the semi-supervised methods more attractive for solving the problem of PolSAR image classification with limited labeled samples [ 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the semi-supervised methods can not only use the information of labeled samples, but also utilize the information of the unlabeled ones to improve the classification performance [ 20 ]. Moreover, in practice, it is feasible to obtain a larger number of unlabeled PolSAR images, which makes the semi-supervised methods more attractive for solving the problem of PolSAR image classification with limited labeled samples [ 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-supervised classification utilizes unlabeled samples to expand training sets, which greatly contributes towards overcoming over-fitting and achieving a better classification accuracy. In general, semi-supervised classification can be divided into five categories, including generation models [24], self-training models [25], co-training models [26], tranductive SVMs [27], and graph-based models [28]. Among all the semi-supervised models, the self-training model, the co-training model and the graph-based model are the most frequently used in PolSAR classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the semi-supervised models, the self-training model, the co-training model and the graph-based model are the most frequently used in PolSAR classification. A semi-supervised PolSAR classification method based on improved co-training has been proposed in the literature [26]. Two sufficient and conditionally independent views were constructed for the co-training process based on features of PolSAR images, and a novel sample selection strategy for selecting reliable unlabeled samples is used to update this process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, PolSAR image classification has attracted extensive research attention and more and more methods are proposed to accomplish this task. The majority of available methods are based on feature extraction and representation [7]- [9], and classifier designing and optimization [10]- [12]. In general, polarimetric target decomposition is one of most powerful and widely used methods for feature extraction of PolSAR images, such as Krogager decomposition [13], Pauli decomposition [14], H/a/A decomposition [15], Freeman three-component decomposition [16], and Huynen decomposition [17], Yamaguchi decomposition [18], and the extensions of the these mentioned methods [19], [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%