2021
DOI: 10.1215/21562261-2020-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semisimplicity of the category of admissible D-modules

Abstract: Using a representation theoretic parametrization for the orbits in the enhanced cyclic nilpotent cone, derived by the authors in a previous article, we compute the fundamental group of these orbits. This computation has several applications to the representation theory of the category of admissible D-modules on the space of representations of the framed cyclic quiver. First, and foremost, we compute precisely when this category is semi-simple. We also show that the category of admissible Dmodules has enough pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we have shown in Proposition 12.1 that eu V acts locally finitely on every object of C χ ,0 , it follows that strongly admissibility in our situation is the same as χ-admissibility as defined in [BB,Section 4.1]. Therefore, it follows from [BB,Proposition 1.4] that C χ ,0 has enough projectives. The same result holds for the corresponding category C op χ,0 of right modules.…”
Section: Let Eumentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since we have shown in Proposition 12.1 that eu V acts locally finitely on every object of C χ ,0 , it follows that strongly admissibility in our situation is the same as χ-admissibility as defined in [BB,Section 4.1]. Therefore, it follows from [BB,Proposition 1.4] that C χ ,0 has enough projectives. The same result holds for the corresponding category C op χ,0 of right modules.…”
Section: Let Eumentioning
confidence: 59%
“…which implies that χ • δ := χ 0 + • • • + χ ℓ−1 = 0. By [BB,Theorem 6.7], G 0 is not semisimple in this case. In fact, the same conclusion holds for any ς for which the Hecke algebra is semisimple; the condition χ • δ = 0 holds for all ς so G 0 is never semisimple.…”
Section: Examples Iii: Further Examplesmentioning
confidence: 96%