2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-015-0643-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semisimplicity and rigidity of the Kontsevich-Zorich cocycle

Abstract: We prove that invariant subbundles of the Kontsevich-Zorich cocycle respect the Hodge structure. In particular, we establish a version of Deligne semisimplicity in this context. This implies that invariant subbundles must vary polynomially on affine manifolds. All results apply to tensor powers of the cocycle and this implies that the measurable and real-analytic algebraic hulls coincide. We also prove that affine manifolds parametrize Jacobians with non-trivial endomorphisms. Typically a factor has real mul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the last set is symmetric, the Lyapunov exponents of ((A p ) −1 ) tr and A p are the same. Moreover, ((A p ) −1 ) tr meets all properties of A p used in the current part of the proof, more precisely, ((A p ) −1 ) tr is the composition of A with a group endomorphism so that the results of [16] can be applied. It follows that for every 0 < ε < 1 there exist λ > 0 and L ∈ N such that for a.e.…”
Section: (113)mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the last set is symmetric, the Lyapunov exponents of ((A p ) −1 ) tr and A p are the same. Moreover, ((A p ) −1 ) tr meets all properties of A p used in the current part of the proof, more precisely, ((A p ) −1 ) tr is the composition of A with a group endomorphism so that the results of [16] can be applied. It follows that for every 0 < ε < 1 there exist λ > 0 and L ∈ N such that for a.e.…”
Section: (113)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Filip in [16] showed that the subbundles V i → M, 1 ≤ i ≤ k locally vary polynomially in the period coordinates. In view of [12], one can deduce that V i → M, 1 ≤ i ≤ k are indeed locally constant whenever the space W ⊂ H 1 (M, R) satisfies the assumptions of Theorem 2.7, as we now explain.…”
Section: (113)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works are concerned with formulas for exponents, spectral gap and non-triviality of exponents, as well as applications to dynamics on translation surfaces. Later, in [8] it was proved that the KZ cocycle is semisimple and its decomposition respects the Hodge structure. Using this property, in [9], an analysis of possible groups appearing in the Zariski closure of the monodromy (or the algebraic hull) was done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that Teichmüller space is in a sense completely inhomogeneous [70], analogies to the dynamics of homogeneous spaces provide insight that has allowed for astounding progress. A decade after McMullen's [54] treatment of the genus 2 case, Eskin and Mirzakhani [17] show that finite ergodic SL 2 (R)-invariant measures are of Lebesgue class and supported on affine varieties; Eskin, Mirzakhani, and Mohammadi [18] show that the closures of SL 2 (R)-orbits are affine manifolds; and Filip [21,22] shows that these closures are algebraic varieties defined over number fields, thus generalizing the aforementioned results for Teichmüller curves. For more on these results and the flurry of work they have inspired see [82].…”
Section: Teichmüller Dynamics and The Hodge Bundlementioning
confidence: 92%