2017
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.11340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation with data missing not at random

Abstract: Nonresponse is frequently encountered in empirical studies. When the response mechanism is missing not at random (MNAR) statistical inference using the observed data is quite challenging. Handling MNAR data often requires two model assumptions: one for the outcome and the other for the response propensity. Correctly specifying these two model assumptions is challenging and difficult to verify from the responses obtained. In this article we propose a semiparametric maximum likelihood method for MNAR data in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method is essentially a parametric method and requires the estimation of the parameters of a (parametric) model chosen to describe the conditional (to V =1) disease process and then the solution of an empirical mean score equation resulting from a parametric model chosen for the verification process. The method may also be used in a semiparametric context, by resorting to a nonparametric regression approach to fit the conditional disease model, as in Morikawa et al (). Clearly, this topic deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our method is essentially a parametric method and requires the estimation of the parameters of a (parametric) model chosen to describe the conditional (to V =1) disease process and then the solution of an empirical mean score equation resulting from a parametric model chosen for the verification process. The method may also be used in a semiparametric context, by resorting to a nonparametric regression approach to fit the conditional disease model, as in Morikawa et al (). Clearly, this topic deserves further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it is scarcely flexible, because identifiability is proven only for the specific parametric assumptions about the verification and the disease processes. Secondly, because of NI missingness, it does not allow a statistical check of appropriateness of such assumptions (see also; Riddles et al, ; Morikawa et al, ; Yu et al, ). Finally, as pointed out by the authors themselves, MEL of ignorable/NI parameters λ 1 and λ 2 are typically highly biased, in cases of moderate or even high sample sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Morikawa et al [17] proposed a semiparametric method for (3.2) in the case of independent and identical distribution data. Based on the first-step imputation, a similar way (refer to Louis [16]) is considered to establish the estimation equation for ϕ by solving…”
Section: Semiparametric Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shao and Wang [22] proposed a semiparametric inverse propensity weighting method using the nonresponse instrumental variable assumption of Wang et al [24], which discussed the identification of parameter for MNAR data as well. Riddles et al [20] proposed a propensity score adjustment method for MNAR data with a specified parametric model for the conditional distribution of respondents, and Morikawa et al [17] loosen this restriction to a semiparametric estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation