2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0266466614000887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiparametric Estimation of Partially Linear Transformation Models Under Conditional Quantile Restriction

Abstract: This article is concerned with semiparametric estimation of a partially linear transformation model under conditional quantile restriction with no parametric restriction imposed either on the link functional form or on the error term distribution. We describe for the finite-dimensional parameter a $\sqrt n$-consistent estimator which combines the features of Chen (2010)’s maximum integrated score estimator as well as Lee (2003)’s average quantile regression. We show the remaining two infinite-dimensional unkno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for employing the linear part x1β10 is also applicable for model identification under the maximum score approach. Similar model specification can be found in Krief () and Zhang (). For empirical study, the economic implication behind why Z does not contain X 1 is that X 1 has no influence on endogenous dummy variable D , which is easy to inspect.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for employing the linear part x1β10 is also applicable for model identification under the maximum score approach. Similar model specification can be found in Krief () and Zhang (). For empirical study, the economic implication behind why Z does not contain X 1 is that X 1 has no influence on endogenous dummy variable D , which is easy to inspect.…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 reports means and stand deviations (STDs) of the ξβ0 values for four estimators of β0: βˆT1 (MAVE estimator under T1), βˆT2 (MAVE estimator under T2), trueβˆ (estimator selected from βˆT1 and βˆT2 using cross validation method), and βˆZZ (Zhang's, 2014 estimator (). It can be seen that in some cases βˆT1 performed better than βˆT2, and worse in other cases.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the IILLR and ZZ (Zhang, ) estimators for the nonlinear link function gfalse(·false) are tabulated in Table 3. We can see that the IILLR estimator performs much better than the ZZ estimator in all the cases we considered.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations