2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2006.00515.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiparametric Estimation of a Two‐component Mixture Model where One Component is known

Abstract: We consider a two-component mixture model where one component distribution is known while the mixing proportion and the other component distribution are unknown. These kinds of models were first introduced in biology to study the differences in expression between genes. The various estimation methods proposed till now have all assumed that the unknown distribution belongs to a parametric family. In this paper, we show how this assumption can be relaxed. First, we note that generally the above model is not iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correction for the false discovery rate (FDR) [2] was the most commonly used technique for adjusting P-values. However, a direct comparison of multiple testing procedures occurred in the INRA_T analyses, with the two novel methods presented out-performing the FDR procedure proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg [2] in terms of error rate; the mixture model described by Bordes et al [3] performed particularly well. The performance of the INRA_T methods is of note given that similar gene-by-gene methods have been shown to lack power in comparison to shrinkage methods such as limma [17] and the structural model [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correction for the false discovery rate (FDR) [2] was the most commonly used technique for adjusting P-values. However, a direct comparison of multiple testing procedures occurred in the INRA_T analyses, with the two novel methods presented out-performing the FDR procedure proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg [2] in terms of error rate; the mixture model described by Bordes et al [3] performed particularly well. The performance of the INRA_T methods is of note given that similar gene-by-gene methods have been shown to lack power in comparison to shrinkage methods such as limma [17] and the structural model [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INRA_J used a structural mixed model, more completely described in Jaffrézic et al [11]. CDB employed a cut-off value for the mean log ratio to define the proportion of differentially expressed genes [10,18] [3]. Apart from INRA_T, those methods that corrected P-values for multiple testing did so using the FDR as described by Benjamini and Hochberg [2].…”
Section: Methods For Finding Differentially Expressed Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model appears in the study of gene expression data coming from microarray analysis. An application to two bovine gestation mode comparison is performed in [1]. The authors suppose that θ is known, f 0 is symmetric around an unknown µ and that r = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another application of model (1) in genetics can be found in [3]. The semiparametric model was employed in [4] (supposing that θ is known) for multiple testing procedures in order to estimate the posterior population probabilities and the local false rate discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation