2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seminars and interactive lectures as a community of knowledge co-construction: The use of modifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretation and Discussion In overall use, 'I think' was much more frequent than 'I guess,' despite existing studies suggesting both are frequent in academic discourse (Biber, 2006b;Kärkkäinen, 2007;Lin, 2015). General usage patterns emerged for both markers, but the analyses also indicated a fair number of individual differences among speakers.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interpretation and Discussion In overall use, 'I think' was much more frequent than 'I guess,' despite existing studies suggesting both are frequent in academic discourse (Biber, 2006b;Kärkkäinen, 2007;Lin, 2015). General usage patterns emerged for both markers, but the analyses also indicated a fair number of individual differences among speakers.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The target ES markers in this study, 'I think' and 'I guess,' are two of the most frequently occurring epistemic markers in English overall (Kaltenböck, 2010) and specifically in university registers (Biber, 2006b;Kärkkäinen, 2007;Lin, 2015). However, few descriptive studies on classroom discourse include these two markers.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of its significance in relation to knowledge dissemination and assessment in academic contexts (Lillis & Scott, 2008), written discourse is mostly prioritized (e.g., Giannoni, 2008;Martin, Rey-Roch, Burgess, & Moreno, 2014;Samraj, 2008;Molle & Prior, 2008;Nesi & Gardner, 2011;Sawaki, 2014;Lancaster, 2016). Fewer studies, in comparison, focus on spoken genres, such as presentations, conference proceedings and lectures despite their significance and increasing use in academic contexts (e.g., Carter-Thomas & Rowley-Jolivet, 2008;Chang, 2012;Ferguson, 2001;Morton, 2016;Lin, 2015;Webber, 2005). This general concern with textual analyses of written discourse is also echoed within investigations of English language learning and teaching in Saudi Arabia which often focus on identifying and addressing the challenges and difficulties that English language learners face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its significance in relation to knowledge dissemination and assessment in academic contexts (Lillis & Scott, 2008), written discourse is mostly prioritized (e.g., Giannoni, 2008;Martin, Rey-Roch, Burgess, & Moreno, 2014;Samraj, 2008;Molle & Prior, 2008;Nesi & Gardner, 2011;Sawaki, 2014;Lancaster, 2016). Fewer studies, in comparison, focus on spoken genres, such as presentations, conference proceedings and lectures despite their significance and increasing use in academic contexts (e.g., Carter-Thomas & Rowley-Jolivet, 2008;Chang, 2012;Ferguson, 2001;Morton, 2016;Lin, 2015;Webber, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%