I show that the cohomology of the generic points of algebraic complex varieties becomes stable birational invariant, when considered 'modulo the cohomology of the generic points of the affine spaces'.These notes are concerned with certain birational invariants of smooth algebraic varieties. All such invariants are dominant sheaves, cf. below; the dominant sheaves are characterized in Proposition 1.7.Two classes of invariants are of special interest: (i) stable, i.e., taking the same values on a variety and on its direct product with an affine space, and (ii) constant on the projective spaces. Though the latter class is a priori wider, there are no known examples of non-stable invariants vanishing on the projective spaces. Here an attempt of comparison is made. Namely, it is shown that the corresponding adjoint functors coincide on the following types of invariants: (i) of 'level 1', cf. Proposition 2.10 and also p.15, (ii) 'related to cohomology' (or to closed differential forms).Differential forms play a very special rôle in the story, cf. e.g. Conjecture 1.5. Moreover, all known examples of simple invariants (as objects of an abelian category) 'come from' differential forms: except for two invariants related to the multiplicative and the additive groups (Y → (k(Y ) × /k × ) Q and Y → k(Y )/k, the logarithmic and the exact differentials, cf. below), they are values of the functor B 0 from §1.3. For these reasons the differential forms are studied in detail. It is shown in Corollary 2.8 that the cohomology of the generic points of algebraic (complex) varieties becomes stable birational invariant, when considered 'modulo the cohomology of the generic points of the affine spaces'.The principal new results of §3 are Propositions 3.3 and 3.7. It is shown in Proposition 3.3 that (i) the quotient V • of the sheaf of algebras of closed differential forms by the ideal generated by the exact 1-forms and the logarithmic differentials is stable and (ii) V • is the maximal stable quotient of the sheaf of closed differential forms. Proposition 3.7 gives a complete description of the sheaf of closed 1-forms.Depending on what is more convenient, we shall consider our 'invariants' either as dominant sheaves, or as representations, cf. §2.5. E.g., the simplicity is more natural in the context of representations.