2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.110.148104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiempirical Model for the Ion Impact Ionization of Complex Biological Media

Abstract: We present a semiempirical model for calculating the electron emission from any organic compound after ion impact. With only the input of the density and composition of the target we are able to evaluate its ionization cross sections using plausible approximations. Results for protons impacting in the most representative biological targets (such as water or DNA components) show a very good comparison with experimental data. Because of its simplicity and great predictive effectiveness, the method can be immedia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
141
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our present results of ionization potential are compared with available previous work for dry DNA (I= 81.02 eV) [8] good agreement is achieved in previous work [16]. [25] 75 [9] 77.01 PMMA 68.37 [9] 74 [9] 79.55 H2O 72.5 [9] 75 [9] 76.32…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Our present results of ionization potential are compared with available previous work for dry DNA (I= 81.02 eV) [8] good agreement is achieved in previous work [16]. [25] 75 [9] 77.01 PMMA 68.37 [9] 74 [9] 79.55 H2O 72.5 [9] 75 [9] 76.32…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Figure 2 presents the number of electrons per unit length per unit energy produced via the plasmon excitation mechanism by the 1 nm spherical NPs due to 1 MeV proton irradiation. We have also compared the electron production by the NPs and by the equivalent volume of pure water medium [38]. Comparative analysis of the spectra demonstrates that the number of LEE (with the kinetic energy of about a few eV) produced due to the plasmon excitations in the noble metal NPs is about one order of magnitude higher than that by liquid water.…”
Section: Fig 1 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of electrons per unit length per unit energy produced via the plasmon excitations in the Au, Pt, Ag and Gd NPs irradiated by a 1 MeV proton. Open circles represent the number of electron generated from the equivalent volume of water [38]. Inset: contributions of the surface (dashed) and the volume (dash-dotted) plasmons to the electron yield from the AuNP.…”
Section: Fig 2 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid and dashed blue curves represent the results obtained recently within the dielectric formalism [80,81]. This approach is based on the experimental measurements of the energy-loss function of the target medium, Im[−1/ǫ(ω, q)], where ǫ(ω, q) is the complex dielectric function, with ω and q being the energy and the momentum transferred to the electronic excitation, respectively.…”
Section: Electron Production Via the Plasmon Excitation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10 shows the relative enhancement of the electron yield from the Au 32 cluster as compared to pure water. The data for the gold nanoparticle are normalized to the spectrum for liquid water [81]. The solid line shows the contribution of the plasmon excitations to the electron yield, while the dashed line presents the contribution from the atomic 5d giant resonance, estimated using Eq.…”
Section: Contribution Of Individual Atomic Excitations To Electronmentioning
confidence: 99%