2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-017-1152-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semidefinite and linear programming integrality gaps for scheduling identical machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The example is almost similar to the example in [24] which was used to show integrality gap examples for strong LP relaxations for identical machines makespan minimization problem. We just sketch a proof here.…”
Section: Max-min Allocation Problems and Supply Polyhedramentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Proof. The example is almost similar to the example in [24] which was used to show integrality gap examples for strong LP relaxations for identical machines makespan minimization problem. We just sketch a proof here.…”
Section: Max-min Allocation Problems and Supply Polyhedramentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This shows a natural limitation to the power of hierarchies as one-fit-all techniques. Quite remarkably, the instances used for obtaining lower bounds often have a very symmetric structure [43,21,56,40,58], which suggests a strong connection between the tightness of the relaxation given by these hierarchies and symmetries. The main purpose of this article is to study this connection for a specific relevant problem, namely, minimum makespan scheduling on identical machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stronger configuration linear program, uses an exponential number of variables y iC which indicate whether the set of jobs assigned to i has C as a multiset of processing times. Kurpisz et al [40] showed that the configuration linear program has an integrality gap of at least 1024/1023 ≈ 1.0009 even after a linear number of rounds of the LS + or SA hierarchies. Hence, the same lower bound holds when the ground formulation is the assignment linear program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations