1981
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.280310176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiconductor-electrochemical aspects of bacterial leaching. I. Oxidation of metal sulphides with large energy gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion can be deduced directly from the relationship between the solubility product of the sulphide and the estimated bacterial activity (Figure 1). If semiconductors with an excess of holes (CU~S, CuS) are excluded from these considerations, the experimental data fit to a dependence, which can approximately be described as: log CB= -a log Kso (1) in which CB is the estimated bacterial concentration and KSO is the solubility product of the sulphide which is defined as:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion can be deduced directly from the relationship between the solubility product of the sulphide and the estimated bacterial activity (Figure 1). If semiconductors with an excess of holes (CU~S, CuS) are excluded from these considerations, the experimental data fit to a dependence, which can approximately be described as: log CB= -a log Kso (1) in which CB is the estimated bacterial concentration and KSO is the solubility product of the sulphide which is defined as:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxidation products in the case of FeS 2 and MoS 2 con-sisted of up to 90% sulfate and about 1 to 2% polythionates. Because the valence bands of FeS 2 and MoS 2 are derived only from the metal orbitals, the valence bands do not contribute to the chemical bond between the metal and the sulfur moiety in the crystal (2,25). Consequently, these metal sulfides are degradable only by an oxidizing attack, e.g., by iron(III) ions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these metal sulfides are degradable only by an oxidizing attack, e.g., by iron(III) ions. None of these compounds is soluble in acid (proton attack) (21,25,26). Furthermore, both metal sulfides consist of pairs of sulfur atoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acidophilic, iron(II) ion-oxidizing bacteria Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans are the most important mesophiles for the extraction of metals from sulfidic ores by bioleaching (13,27). Little is known about the interfacial processes leading to the degradation of metal sulfides (26), because of a complex interaction of electrochemical, biochemical, and surface-specific mechanisms (25,33). Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) mediate the contact between the bacterial cell and the sulfidic energy source, having a pivotal role in organic film formation and bacterium-substratum interactions (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%