2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3889(200106)10:6/7<541::aid-andp541>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiclassical trace formulae using coherent states

Abstract: We derive semiclassical trace formulae including Gutzwiller's trace formula using coherent states. This formulation has several advantages over the usual coordinate-space formulation. Using a coherent-state basis makes it immediately obvious that classical periodic orbits make separate contributions to the trace of the quantum-mechanical time evolution operator. In addition, our approach is manifestly canonically invariant at all stages, and leads to the simplest possible derivation of Gutzwiller's formula.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we want the hopping and interaction terms in a Bose-Hubbard like system to remain comparable we then have to adjust the corresponding coefficients in a way similar to the case If the Hamiltonian is written in Weyl instead of normal ordering one obtains an analogous result however without a SK phase. This is in line with [24] as well as results for the propagator in [27,33]. A derivation along the lines followed here will be given in appendix B; it uses the analogue of the discretised action stated in [33] and the corresponding Hessian is again evaluated with the help of [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we want the hopping and interaction terms in a Bose-Hubbard like system to remain comparable we then have to adjust the corresponding coefficients in a way similar to the case If the Hamiltonian is written in Weyl instead of normal ordering one obtains an analogous result however without a SK phase. This is in line with [24] as well as results for the propagator in [27,33]. A derivation along the lines followed here will be given in appendix B; it uses the analogue of the discretised action stated in [33] and the corresponding Hessian is again evaluated with the help of [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…is related to but somewhat simpler than the path integral for matrix elements of coherent state time evolution operator [27]; our use of tr e Ht i is motivated by [24,25]. In case of normal ordering the path integral can be derived by splitting the time interval t into  steps of width t  t = and then using the result for the short-time propagator…”
Section: Path Integral For Many-particle Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will show that provided we choose the integer ν correctly this is the Weyl representation of ± S ∈ Mp(n) such that π Mp ( S) = S (the definition of the operators (7.62) is due to Mehlig and Wilkinson [121], who however do not make precise the integer ν). Anyhow, formula (7.62) defines a Weyl operator with complex Gaussian twisted symbol…”
Section: The Operators R ν (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this caseR 1 (F ) has a smooth Weyl symbol given by the following formula: (see [10] where we have named this formula the "Mehlig-Wilkinson formula", according to the physics literature [22]) R(F, X) = e iπν |det(1l + F )| −1/2 exp −iJ(1l − F )(1l + F ) −1 X · X (4.17)…”
Section: Then We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates are non-perturbative, and are carefully calculated in terms of parameters (z, δ, t, ). The main tools we have used and developed in this respect are 1) semiclassical coherent states propagation estimates ( [9]) 2) a beautiful formula inspired by B. Mehlig and M. Wilkinson ( [22]) about the Weyl symbol of a metaplectic operator, and thus of its expectation value in coherent states as a simple Gaussian phase-space integral ( see [10] where we have completed the proof of Mehlig-Wilkinson, and treated in particular the case where the monodromy operator has eigenvalue 1). Note that very recently, J. Bolte and T. Schwaibold have independently obtained a similar result about semiclassical estimates of the Quantum Fidelity ( [2]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%