2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00335-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semicircular canal fenestration – improvement of bone- but not air-conducted auditory thresholds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
37
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously reported low-frequency increases in CP response to BC stimuli in chinchilla after the introduction of a SCD with a mean gain of 8.1 dB near 500 Hz . The increased sensitivity to BC in chinchilla is consistent with clinical observations of super-sensitive (<0 dB) BC thresholds in many patients with SCD syndrome (Minor et al, 2003;Mikulec et al, 2004) as well as those found in sandrat (Sohmer et al, 2004). At 500 Hz, the present study showed an 8.7 dB decrease in the chinchillas response to AC stimuli.…”
Section: Comparison To Clinical Studiessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We previously reported low-frequency increases in CP response to BC stimuli in chinchilla after the introduction of a SCD with a mean gain of 8.1 dB near 500 Hz . The increased sensitivity to BC in chinchilla is consistent with clinical observations of super-sensitive (<0 dB) BC thresholds in many patients with SCD syndrome (Minor et al, 2003;Mikulec et al, 2004) as well as those found in sandrat (Sohmer et al, 2004). At 500 Hz, the present study showed an 8.7 dB decrease in the chinchillas response to AC stimuli.…”
Section: Comparison To Clinical Studiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The decrease was largest (mean of 8.6 dB) at low frequencies (less than 500 Hz) and decreased in magnitude as frequency increased until the drop was no longer significant for frequencies above 4 kHz. A previous animal study of SCD in sandrat demonstrated no statistically significant changes in auditory sensitivity in response to air-conducted stimuli (Sohmer et al, 2004). Potential reasons for the differences in results between the two studies include:…”
Section: Comparison To Other Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts to explain the possible functional implications of SCD itself have not reached an unequivocal statement. 5 It is even more difficult to explain the origin of auditory brainstem response anomalies, which might be associated with the carotid pulse, possibly leading to decreased detectability of the electrical activity of the cochlea. The strict contiguity between carotid artery and cochlea might also explain the onset or increased severity of tinnitus by some arterial wall alterations linked to age.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, mechanical manipulations in experimental animals have also cast doubt on this classical mechanism of bone conduction activation of the cochlea, which requires two mobile windows with bulk fluid flow between them (Sohmer et al, 2004;Perez et al, 2011). These mechanical manipulations were extended in the present study by completely immobilizing the entire ossicular chain, stapes footplate and round window, and assessing bone conduction (and air conduction) thresholds by recording auditory nerve and brainstem evoked responses (ABR) before and after the manipulation of immobilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%