2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiannual variation of the geomagnetic Dst index: Evidence for a dominant nonstorm component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
45
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Cliver et al (2000Cliver et al ( , 2001 argued, contrary to current popular thinking, that the R-M effect makes a relatively small contribution to the seasonal modulation of geomagnetic activity, while the equinoctial effect is most dominant. It was suggested that the efficiency of reconnection between the IMF and the geomagnetic field must be modulated by the angle between the flow direction of the solar wind and Earth's dipole axis.…”
Section: Seasonal Dependence Of Geomagnetic Activitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Recently, Cliver et al (2000Cliver et al ( , 2001 argued, contrary to current popular thinking, that the R-M effect makes a relatively small contribution to the seasonal modulation of geomagnetic activity, while the equinoctial effect is most dominant. It was suggested that the efficiency of reconnection between the IMF and the geomagnetic field must be modulated by the angle between the flow direction of the solar wind and Earth's dipole axis.…”
Section: Seasonal Dependence Of Geomagnetic Activitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The purpose of the present study is not to evaluate contribution of each effect to the phenomena, but to investigate physical meaning of the equinoctial effect. Recent detailed studies based on am and D st indices have shown that the equinoctial effect plays the dominant role in the semi-annual variation in geomagnetic activity (Cliver et al, 2000(Cliver et al, , 2001O'Brien and McPherron, 2002), but yet, the physical mechanism by which the equinoctial effect affects geomagnetic activity has not been clarified (Cliver et al, 2004). The present study proposes an idea how the equinoctial effect works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A lot of studies have been done to clarify what a portion of the semi-annual variation in geomagnetic activity is attributed to each of the mechanisms (Cliver et al, 2000(Cliver et al, , 2002(Cliver et al, , 2001O'Brien and McPherron, 2002). de La Sayette and Berthelier (1996) pointed out another effect which would arise from the feature that B z in the geocentric solar equatorial (GSEQ) coordinate system has B z component in the GSM coordinates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Seasonal variations are another consideration. The quiettime D st exhibits seasonal dependence (Cliver et al, 2001;Mursula and Karinen, 2005), although its mechanism has not yet been clarified. On the other hand, the solar-wind conditions around Earth might exhibit seasonal dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-storm long-term variation appears to be roughly periodic. In fact, the quiet-time D st index exhibits seasonal variations (Cliver et al, 2001;Mursula and Karinen, 2005). However, it does not seem that this periodic variation explains all the features of the non-storm long-term variation, which implies that the non-storm variation also includes some non-periodic irregular variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%