2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the preprocessed MRI data as an input to 3D-CNN for MSFI embedding to improve the robustness of MSFI embedding. We expect that we can further improve the pCR prediction performance by applying semi-supervised training techniques for heterogeneous medical image data [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the preprocessed MRI data as an input to 3D-CNN for MSFI embedding to improve the robustness of MSFI embedding. We expect that we can further improve the pCR prediction performance by applying semi-supervised training techniques for heterogeneous medical image data [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much progress has been achieved, the abovementioned patch-level prediction methods still have several inherent drawbacks. First, the patch-based methods required labor-sensitive patch-level annotation, which would increase the workload for the pathologist [ 118 ]. Second, most of the existing patch-based methods usually assumed that the diagnosis or survival information with each randomly selected patch was the same as its corresponding WSI, which neglected the fact that WSI usually had large heterogenous patterns and thus the patch-level label would not always match the WSI-level label [ 119 ].…”
Section: Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods have become more reliable, achieving in some cases a performance that is comparable to pathologists for specific segmentation and classification tasks [1, 5, 2, 15, 9, 12]. Despite the remarkable good performance of some methods, there are still technical barriers that prevent the translation of these advances into clinical applications [17].…”
Section: Motivation and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%