2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-supervised Left Atrium Segmentation with Mutual Consistency Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LA dataset consists of 100 gadolinium-enhanced MRI scans, with a fixed split ‡ of 80 samples for training and 20 samples for validation. We report the performance on the validation set for fair comparisons as [24,7,9,19]. On the ACDC dataset, the data split § is also fixed with 70, 10, and 20 patients' scans for training, validation, and testing, respectively.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The LA dataset consists of 100 gadolinium-enhanced MRI scans, with a fixed split ‡ of 80 samples for training and 20 samples for validation. We report the performance on the validation set for fair comparisons as [24,7,9,19]. On the ACDC dataset, the data split § is also fixed with 70, 10, and 20 patients' scans for training, validation, and testing, respectively.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the public methods [24,7,9,19,10] on both datasets, inputs were normalized as zero mean and unit variance. We used the rotation and flip operations to augment data and trained our model via a SGD optimizer with the initial learning rate 0.01 decayed by 10% every 2.5K iterations.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations