Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1835804.1835905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-supervised feature selection for graph classification

Abstract: The problem of graph classification has attracted great interest in the last decade. Current research on graph classification assumes the existence of large amounts of labeled training graphs. However, in many applications, the labels of graph data are very expensive or difficult to obtain, while there are often copious amounts of unlabeled graph data available. In this paper, we study the problem of semi-supervised feature selection for graph classification and propose a novel solution, called gSSC, to effici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though diverse in terms of underlying approaches, most algorithms [11,30] generally assume a database consisting of "positive" and "negative" graphs, and aim at extracting a set significant subgraphs that are frequently present in one class but absent in the other, which subsequently are used as new (binary) features to train classifiers. These approaches, recently being extended to semi-supervised setting [16], uncertain graphs [15], or multiple side-view [4] which we have adapted for our empirical comparison. Another related work is the one developed in [31] that directly addresses the progressive data but in the non-network context.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though diverse in terms of underlying approaches, most algorithms [11,30] generally assume a database consisting of "positive" and "negative" graphs, and aim at extracting a set significant subgraphs that are frequently present in one class but absent in the other, which subsequently are used as new (binary) features to train classifiers. These approaches, recently being extended to semi-supervised setting [16], uncertain graphs [15], or multiple side-view [4] which we have adapted for our empirical comparison. Another related work is the one developed in [31] that directly addresses the progressive data but in the non-network context.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the embedding process is to utilize confidence weight information to help find informative subgraphs as features to represent graphs. Similar assumptions have also been used in the previous work which handles graphs with labeled and unlabeled graphs [11]. Based on the above constraints, we derive an evaluation criterion for J (g,ŵ) as follows:…”
Section: Alternating Optimization Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transactional data mining aims at discriminating whole graphs based on the occurrence of subgraph patterns (cf. [8] and references therein). The present work instead seeks descriptions of node tuples in terms of their relations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%