2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23073524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Supervised Behavior Labeling Using Multimodal Data during Virtual Teamwork-Based Collaborative Activities

Abstract: Adaptive human–computer systems require the recognition of human behavior states to provide real-time feedback to scaffold skill learning. These systems are being researched extensively for intervention and training in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Autistic individuals are prone to social communication and behavioral differences that contribute to their high rate of unemployment. Teamwork training, which is beneficial for all people, can be a pivotal step in securing employment for these ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the HMM prediction results for Waiting and Struggling were reliable since the temporal information that was learned from the training was embedded within the state transition and emission probability matrices. This is consistent with the results reported by another study that implemented a semi-supervised model using the same dataset as this study [67]. The study compared the performance of the developed semi-supervised automated labeling of behaviors to supervised and unsupervised models.…”
Section: Prediction Models Evaluation Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, the HMM prediction results for Waiting and Struggling were reliable since the temporal information that was learned from the training was embedded within the state transition and emission probability matrices. This is consistent with the results reported by another study that implemented a semi-supervised model using the same dataset as this study [67]. The study compared the performance of the developed semi-supervised automated labeling of behaviors to supervised and unsupervised models.…”
Section: Prediction Models Evaluation Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%