2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3771314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Structural VAR and Unobserved Components Models to Estimate Finance-Neutral Output Gap

Abstract: The paper assesses the impact of adding information on financial cycles on the output gap estimates for eight advanced economies using two unobserved components models: a reduced form extended Hodrick-Prescott filter, and a standard semi-structural unobserved components model. To complement these models, a semi-structural vector autoregression model is proposed in which only supply shocks are identified. The accuracy of the output gap estimates is assessed based on their performance in predicting recessions. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the small UCM which embeds the real house prices variable (model 6) shows very unreliable PC-inflation forecasts. Both models 5 and 6 support the evidence from the literature that suggests that FNOGs may differ from standard output gap estimates (Katay et al, 2020) and therefore might not be adequate gauges of inflationary pressures. The output gaps estimated with the larger UCM (models 6 and 7) prove to have good predictive inflation performance in comparison with the EC output gap, although the forecast errors are larger than for the output gaps of the small UCMs.…”
Section: Inflation -Forecasting Performancesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, the small UCM which embeds the real house prices variable (model 6) shows very unreliable PC-inflation forecasts. Both models 5 and 6 support the evidence from the literature that suggests that FNOGs may differ from standard output gap estimates (Katay et al, 2020) and therefore might not be adequate gauges of inflationary pressures. The output gaps estimated with the larger UCM (models 6 and 7) prove to have good predictive inflation performance in comparison with the EC output gap, although the forecast errors are larger than for the output gaps of the small UCMs.…”
Section: Inflation -Forecasting Performancesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This is also what our work will highlight. Katay et al (2020) also show that FNOGs may be not robust to alternative assumptions for some countries in their sample.…”
Section: Non-technical Summarymentioning
confidence: 91%