1991
DOI: 10.2307/3236031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi‐strong Hybrid Scaling, a new ordination algorithm

Abstract: There is a small group of association measures that appear optimal for comparing sites on the basis of their species composition. These measures can accurately estimate affinity between sites when they are ecologically similar. Once sites share few or no species, these measures always under‐estimate the ‘ecological distance’ between them. A new ordination algorithm called Semi‐strong Hybrid Scaling, SHS, uses these features in an attempt to provide a better configuration of the sites. The new method is evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three-dimensional semi-strong hybrid multidimensional scaling (SSHMDS -PATN Version 3.03, Belbin (1991)) was used to explore relationships among the four sites and the wet and dry season samples on the basis of: (i) instream habitat structure (mean value of each habitat variable at each site on each sampling date); (ii) fish abundance (standardised CPUE of each species summed across methods for each site on each sampling date); and (iii) fish biomass (standardised BPUE of each species summed across methods for each site on each sampling date). Combining catch data from different gear types is an effective way to negate biases caused by gear selectivity (Weaver et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional semi-strong hybrid multidimensional scaling (SSHMDS -PATN Version 3.03, Belbin (1991)) was used to explore relationships among the four sites and the wet and dry season samples on the basis of: (i) instream habitat structure (mean value of each habitat variable at each site on each sampling date); (ii) fish abundance (standardised CPUE of each species summed across methods for each site on each sampling date); and (iii) fish biomass (standardised BPUE of each species summed across methods for each site on each sampling date). Combining catch data from different gear types is an effective way to negate biases caused by gear selectivity (Weaver et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group structure apparent in the resulting dendrogram of survey areas was analysed against the quadrat physical attributes, one by one, using the GSTA module of PATN. Kruskal-Wallis K sample test was used to assess the significance of the relationship, and 'Semi-Strong Hybrid MultiDimensional Scaling' (Belbin, 1991) was used to reduce the dimensionality in the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the purpose of the analysis and the nature of the data, MDS may be applied using metric or nonmetric (NMDS) algorithms, both of which exhibit strengths and weaknesses (see also Thessler et al 2005 for NMDS relating floristic to remotelysensed data). In the present case the PATN multivariate software package was applied using a twodimensional semistrong hybrid scaling (SSH) procedure (Belbin 1991(Belbin , 2008. SSH maximizes the advantages of both MDS procedures by allowing combinations of nonmetric (ordinal or monotone), or metric (ratio) scaling.…”
Section: A T E R I a L S A N D M E T H O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%