2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4795618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-physical parameter identification for an iron-loss formula allowing loss-separation

Abstract: This paper presents a semi-physical parameter identification for a recently proposed enhanced iron-loss formula, the IEM-Formula. Measurements are performed on a standardized Epstein frame by the conventional field-metric method under sinusoidal magnetic flux densities up to high magnitudes and frequencies. Quasi-static losses are identified on the one hand by point-by-point dc-measurements using a flux-meter and on the other hand by extrapolating higher frequency measurements to dc magnetization using the sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At lower material magnetization, the hysteresis losses calculated by the extrapolation method show correlation with the experimental quasi-static losses: with a difference of 22% at 0.8 T and 16% at 1 T magnetization. At higher material magnetization the results diverge considerably: 433 % at 1.25 T and 577% at 1.5 T. The considerable divergence suggests the emergence of nonlinear saturation losses component [20], [21] at deep saturation of the material, requiring higher-order fitting. The hysteresis power loss components of 0.925 W/kg (1 T, 50 Hz) and 2.85 W/kg (1.5 T, 50 Hz) W/kg are comparable to commercial grade materials and other 3D printed soft ferromagnetic materials from the literature.…”
Section: A Hysteresis Measurements Summarymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At lower material magnetization, the hysteresis losses calculated by the extrapolation method show correlation with the experimental quasi-static losses: with a difference of 22% at 0.8 T and 16% at 1 T magnetization. At higher material magnetization the results diverge considerably: 433 % at 1.25 T and 577% at 1.5 T. The considerable divergence suggests the emergence of nonlinear saturation losses component [20], [21] at deep saturation of the material, requiring higher-order fitting. The hysteresis power loss components of 0.925 W/kg (1 T, 50 Hz) and 2.85 W/kg (1.5 T, 50 Hz) W/kg are comparable to commercial grade materials and other 3D printed soft ferromagnetic materials from the literature.…”
Section: A Hysteresis Measurements Summarymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The IEM formula shows the improvement in loss determination at high magnetic flux densities and high frequencies, due to this fourth loss term with a higher-order B dependence [16]. In various scientific studies, this model has been used to calculate the losses in electrical machines.…”
Section: Loss Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the unmodified, stress-independent parameters for calculating the iron loss are used. The parameters are identified using the semi-physical approach presented in Steentjes et al (2013). Therefore, measurements at 50 Hz of the electrical steel M400-50A were used.…”
Section: Iron Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%