2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-parametric dynamic asymmetric Laplace models for tail risk forecasting, incorporating realized measures

Abstract: The joint Value at Risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) quantile regression model of Taylor (2017) is extended via incorporating a realized measure, to drive the tail risk dynamics, as a potentially more efficient driver than daily returns. Both a maximum likelihood and an adaptive Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo method are employed for estimation, whose properties are assessed and compared via a simulation study; results favour the Bayesian approach, which is subsequently employed in a forecasting study o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encompassing tests for different functionals such as e.g., the mean, quantiles, expectiles or probability densities based on link functions which require testing on the boundary (e.g., using convex link functions) can be implemented through adapting our asymptotic theory to semiparametric models for the functional under consideration. Eventually, our asymptotic theory can be used to test (e.g., for nullity of) model parameters on the boundary of the parameter space for the semiparametric VaR and ES models of Patton et al (2019), Taylor (2019) or Gerlach and Wang (2020), along the lines of Francq and Zakoïan (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encompassing tests for different functionals such as e.g., the mean, quantiles, expectiles or probability densities based on link functions which require testing on the boundary (e.g., using convex link functions) can be implemented through adapting our asymptotic theory to semiparametric models for the functional under consideration. Eventually, our asymptotic theory can be used to test (e.g., for nullity of) model parameters on the boundary of the parameter space for the semiparametric VaR and ES models of Patton et al (2019), Taylor (2019) or Gerlach and Wang (2020), along the lines of Francq and Zakoïan (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same context, one could also examine the contribution of different trading partners to the overall magnitude of spillbacks. Models should also encompass the role of global uncertainty shocks (see Box 3) and tail risks (De Santis and Van der Veken, 2020;Gerlach and Wang, 2020;Carriero et al, 2020). Factors such as global credit booms affect the distribution of growth in a non-linear way (Adrian et al, 2019).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the Student's t distribution, the true values of VaR and ES are VaRα,t+1=t1()αvfalse/v2σt+1 and ESα,t+1=1αf()t1()αvfalse/v2σt+1, respectively, where v is the degrees of freedom, f is the probability density function of the standard Student's t , and t1()α is the corresponding α th quantile. Step 4:Compare results. We also apply other seven models: GARCH‐t; realized GARCH‐t (realGARCH‐t) of Hansen et al (2012); JE‐AL‐Mult and JE‐AL‐Add of Taylor (2019); ES‐CAViaR‐Mult‐X, ES‐CAViaR‐Add‐X, and ES‐X‐CAViaR‐X of Gerlach and Wang (2020), to forecast VaR and ES. These seven models all cannot directly use the high‐frequency data to “nowcast” the current period's risk.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%