2010
DOI: 10.1080/07408170903394371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Markov models for degradation-based reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degradation process is also often modelled as a Markov process with discrete states. Optimal replacement policies were derived for observable Markov processes by Makis and Jiang [20] and Kharoufeh et al [14] and from the evolution of the hidden states by Bunks et al [4] and Lin and Makis [18]. Further, proportional hazards models are often used to relate the system's condition variables to the hazard function of a system, so that the maintenance policies can be optimized with respect to the optimal risk value of the hazard function; see Jardine et al [12] and Vlok et al [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degradation process is also often modelled as a Markov process with discrete states. Optimal replacement policies were derived for observable Markov processes by Makis and Jiang [20] and Kharoufeh et al [14] and from the evolution of the hidden states by Bunks et al [4] and Lin and Makis [18]. Further, proportional hazards models are often used to relate the system's condition variables to the hazard function of a system, so that the maintenance policies can be optimized with respect to the optimal risk value of the hazard function; see Jardine et al [12] and Vlok et al [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failures usually occur when the degradation level of a system reaches its failure threshold level, so that the condition monitoring data and stochastic models of the degradation processes are often necessary to estimate remaining useful lifetimes (RUL) or reliability functions. Si et al (2011) distinguished two types of probability models of RUL estimation: directly observed CBM models [e.g., regression-based models Lu andMeeker 1993, Wiener process Gebraeel et al 2005, Gamma processes (van Noortwijk 2009), Markovian-based models (Kharoufeh et al 2010)] and indirectly observed CBM models [e.g., stochastic filtering-based models (Wang and Christer 2000), covariation-based hazard model (Vlok et al 2002), hidden Markov model (Lin and Makis 2003)]. In this paper, we consider systems with continuously observable degradation processes, which is a typical feature of systems in the industry of advance capital goods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the degradation process could be modeled as discrete states, Markovian-based models were applied. The optimal replacement policies were derived from observable Markov processes (Kharoufeh et al 2010) or the evolution of the hidden states (Jiang et al 2013). Moreover, Proportional Hazards Models are also often used to relate the system's condition variables to the hazard function of a system (Vlok et al 2002), so that the maintenance policies can be optimized with respect to the optimal risk value of the hazard function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there are many systems in which a unit cannot be kept as spare due to its high cost. Therefore, reliability models of single-unit systems with different failure modes have also been probed by the authors including Malik and Bansal [7], Malik [8], Kharoufeh J.P. et al [5], Malik et al [9] and Uematsu and Nishida [11] and Pawar and Malik [10] keeping in view of their practical utility and common man's affordability under the following assumptions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%