2020
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201903168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi‐Flooded Sulfur Cathode with Ultralean Absorbed Electrolyte in Li–S Battery

Abstract: times higher than state-of-art lithiumion batteries (LIB). [1] However, highly porous S 8 cathode [2] and superabundant electrolyte (e.g., E/S ratio >10 µL mg −1 for coin cells and >3 µL mg −1 for pouch cells) [3] are often cited in the literature to reach satisfactory sulfur utilization and cycling numbers. In contrast, E/S in LIB is only ≈0.3 µL mg −1 . [3e] A high E/S drastically reduces the Li-S full-cell gravimetric energy density. [1c,4] For example, when E/S > 10 µL mg −1 , the energy density of fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25b] Moreover,c ontact angle tests have been conducted to evaluate the electrolyte wettability of electrodes with different samples.I ntroduced POAC-4 can result in decreased contact angle (13.18 8)o fP OAC-4 based electrode when compared with that of PVDF based electrode (20.98 8), which might be attributed to the presence of abundant polar groups in POAC-4 that are beneficial for the improvement of wettability (Figure S20). [27] To verify the electrocatalytic activity of POAC-4 based electrode within ap otential window from À0.8 to 0.8 V, symmetric cells are assembled using POAC-4 or bare PVDF based electrodes as both anode and cathode and carried out in cyclic voltammogram (CV) profiles at ascan rate of 50 mV s À1 (Figure S21). As ar esult, the symmetric cells with POAC-4 based electrode exhibit higher current with obvious redox peaks compared to bare PVDF based electrode,implying that POAC-4 possesses better electrochemical kinetics for the rapid redox conversion reactions of LiPSs on the electrolyte/ electrode surface (Figure S21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25b] Moreover,c ontact angle tests have been conducted to evaluate the electrolyte wettability of electrodes with different samples.I ntroduced POAC-4 can result in decreased contact angle (13.18 8)o fP OAC-4 based electrode when compared with that of PVDF based electrode (20.98 8), which might be attributed to the presence of abundant polar groups in POAC-4 that are beneficial for the improvement of wettability (Figure S20). [27] To verify the electrocatalytic activity of POAC-4 based electrode within ap otential window from À0.8 to 0.8 V, symmetric cells are assembled using POAC-4 or bare PVDF based electrodes as both anode and cathode and carried out in cyclic voltammogram (CV) profiles at ascan rate of 50 mV s À1 (Figure S21). As ar esult, the symmetric cells with POAC-4 based electrode exhibit higher current with obvious redox peaks compared to bare PVDF based electrode,implying that POAC-4 possesses better electrochemical kinetics for the rapid redox conversion reactions of LiPSs on the electrolyte/ electrode surface (Figure S21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10–12 ] Moreover, to ensure fast redox kinetics, an electrolyte/sulfur ratio (E/S) of higher than 15 µL mg −1 is widely adopted for the “dissolution‐precipitation” cathode mode, which sacrifices the total energy density. [ 13–16 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, contact angle tests have been conducted to evaluate the electrolyte wettability of electrodes with different samples. Introduced POAC‐4 can result in decreased contact angle (13.1°) of POAC‐4 based electrode when compared with that of PVDF based electrode (20.9°), which might be attributed to the presence of abundant polar groups in POAC‐4 that are beneficial for the improvement of wettability (Figure S20) [27] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%