2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2018.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-classical limit of the Levy–Lieb functional in Density Functional Theory

Abstract: In a recent work, Bindini and De Pascale have introduced a regularization of N -particle symmetric probabilities which preserves their one-particle marginals. In this short note, we extend their construction to mixed quantum fermionic states. This enables us to prove the convergence of the Levy-Lieb functional in Density Functional Theory, to the corresponding multi-marginal optimal transport in the semiclassical limit. Our result holds for mixed states of any particle number N , with or without spin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the semi-classical limit is considered, as already proved in [2,7,8,16], the stationary states reach the minimum of potential energy, i.e.,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…When the semi-classical limit is considered, as already proved in [2,7,8,16], the stationary states reach the minimum of potential energy, i.e.,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In Fig. 2, we provide the profile of δF ZPE /δρ(x) for the test densities (39). The plots show that the shape of the curve can vary drastically depending on the density chosen.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Selected Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in all the densities we chose (excluding ρ 3 ) the functional derivative Figure 2. Functional derivative as from (35) for the first three densities (39). Hartree atomic units.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Selected Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which can be proved rigorously. In fact, when w is the Coulomb potential in R 3 , the lower bound in (16) is a direct consequence of the Lieb-Oxford inequality [22] I N (f ) (17) and the upper bound in (16) can be achieved easily by choosing a Slater determinant (a wave function of the form Ψ N = u 1 ∧ u 2 ∧ ... ∧ u N ) with the density N f . The proof of (16) for more general w can be extracted from the proof of our main result below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%