2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2004.1327182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-blind deconvolution of neural impulse response in fMRI using a Gibbs sampling method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where f (y|θ) and f (Φ) have been defined in (5) and (14). The conjugacy of priors in this hierarchical structure allows one to integrate out the parameters σ 2 , and the hyperparameter Φ in the full posterior distribution (15), yielding:…”
Section: Posterior Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f (y|θ) and f (Φ) have been defined in (5) and (14). The conjugacy of priors in this hierarchical structure allows one to integrate out the parameters σ 2 , and the hyperparameter Φ in the full posterior distribution (15), yielding:…”
Section: Posterior Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also demonstrated that these joint models can obtain improved performance over comparable two-stage models. This model can be further extended to the semi-blind case where some information about the blur function may be assumed to be known [38][39][40][41][42][43] which allows for increases in speed and to work with multi-channel images. This model will be considered for selective segmentation 9 and vessel segmentation techniques among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by solving the discrete counterpart of the EL equation (29) for the discrete image k of using discrete Fourier transforms;…”
Section: A Blind Deconvolution Model With Fractional Regularisationmentioning
confidence: 99%