2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30284-8_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automatically Mapping Structured Sources into the Semantic Web

Abstract: Abstract. Linked data continues to grow at a rapid rate, but a limitation of a lot of the data that is being published is the lack of a semantic description. There are tools, such as D2R, that allow a user to quickly convert a database into RDF, but these tools do not provide a way to easily map the data into an existing ontology. This paper presents a semiautomatic approach to map structured sources to ontologies in order to build semantic descriptions (source models). Since the precise mapping is sometimes a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
106
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We then used our algorithm to learn a source description for each source given the manually created source descriptions of the other sources as training data (The original source descriptions and the results are available at: http://isi.edu/integration/data/iswc2013). Since the semantic labeling is not the focus of this paper, we assume that Algorithm 2 is given the correct semantic type for each attribute (we evaluated the semantic labeling in our previous work [13,24]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We then used our algorithm to learn a source description for each source given the manually created source descriptions of the other sources as training data (The original source descriptions and the results are available at: http://isi.edu/integration/data/iswc2013). Since the semantic labeling is not the focus of this paper, we assume that Algorithm 2 is given the correct semantic type for each attribute (we evaluated the semantic labeling in our previous work [13,24]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the results of our approach with the results of Karma [13], a data integration tool that allows users to semi-automatically create source descriptions for sources and services. To make the Karma results comparable to our approach, we also gave Karma the correct semantic types for each attribute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our example, the correct choice is the first one because the information in the table is about Pathways that involve our Gene. After users make a selection, Karma recomputes the Steiner tree, which is now required to include the class/property selections users make [5]). Figure 5 shows the correct, updated model.…”
Section: Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Karma is unable to infer the semantic type for a column, users can interactively assign the desired type; Karma uses the assigned type and the data in the column to train a CRF model to recognize the type in the future [4]. The semantic types are used by our Steiner tree algorithm to compute the source model as the minimum tree that connects the assigned semantic types via properties in the ontology (the details of the approach are published elsewhere [5]). Because the minimum model is not always the desired model, Karma provides a user interface to enable users to force this algorithm to include specific properties in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%